OSHA Inspection: SUPERIOR KIA MITSUBISHI

Issued

2016-10-27 00:00:00

Abate by

2016-11-10 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $4988.00 · Current $2494.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment:    On or about August 23, 2016 and times prior thereto, at the worksite located at or near 3195 N College Avenue in Fayetteville, Arkansas, the employer did not ensure that employees were wearing eye protection when mixing and spraying chemicals, such as but not limited to, KM-30 Concentrated Formula, Wheel Acid Concentrate, Moonshine. This exposed employees to chemical hazards.

Issued

2016-10-27 00:00:00

Abate by

2016-11-10 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2138.00 · Current $1069.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    On August 23, 2016 and times prior thereto, at the worksite located at or near 3195 N College Avenue in Fayetteville, Arkansas, an employee operated an AMMCO Disc-Drum Brake Lathe with 6900 Twin Cutter to turn rotators for brake maintenance without a chip guard. This condition exposed employees to struck by hazards.

Issued

2016-10-27 00:00:00

Abate by

2016-11-10 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical  On or about August 23, 2016 and times prior thereto, at the worksite located at or near 3195 N College Avenue in Fayetteville, Arkansas, the employer did not ensure that each container in the workplace was labeled with a product name. This included, but is not limited to, bottles of window cleaner and the solution used to check tire leaks. This hazard exposed employees to chemical hazards.

Issued

2016-10-27 00:00:00

Abate by

2016-11-10 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $400.00 · Current $200.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    On August 23, 2016 and times prior thereto, at the worksite located 3195 N College in Fayetteville, Arkansas, the employer did not ensure employees were effectively trained to locate and utilize the site's material safety data sheets or safety data sheets. This exposed employees to chemical hazards.