Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: SOLUTIONS CONTRACTING, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SOLUTIONS CONTRACTING, INC. in 241 S. MONROE ST., PITTSFIELD, IL 62363 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341723377.

Watch Solutions Contracting, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Solutions Contracting, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
241 S. MONROE ST.
City
PITTSFIELD
State
IL
ZIP
62363
Mailing
2274 HIGHWAY 104, LIBERTY, IL 62347
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3741.00 · Current $1870.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:    On or about August 24, 2016, employees performing roofing operations were exposed to fall hazards and the employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program to control and eliminate the hazards present at the jobsite.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1870
  • — Z (S) $3741

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s)   On or about August 24, 2016, employees performing roofing activities from a ladder jack scaffold and an aerial lift were exposed to fall hazards and a competent person had not performed frequent and regular safety inspections of the construction site to identify and eliminate the hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3741.00 · Current $3741.00
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.     On or about, August 24, 2016, employees accessing the work platform of a ladder jack scaffold were exposed to fall hazards because the employer did not provide a ladder which was free of obstructions to use as access to the platform.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3741
  • — Z (S) $3741

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3741.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level.    On or about August 24, 2016, employees performing roofing activities from a ladder jack scaffold were exposed to fall hazards and the employer did not ensure that appropriate fall protection was utilized.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3741

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.    a) On or about August 24, 2016, employees performing roofing activities from a ladder jack scaffold were exposed to fall hazards and the employer had not ensured that each employee was trained to recognize the fall hazard and the steps necessary to minimize the hazard.    b) On or about August 24, 2016, an employee performing roofing activities from an aerial lift was exposed to fall hazards and the employer had not ensured that each employee was trained to recognize the fall hazard and the steps necessary to minimize the hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.452 K01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3741.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(1): Platforms exceeded a height of 20 feet (6.1 m)    On or about August 24, 2016, employees performing roofing activities from the platform of a ladder jack scaffold were exposed to fall hazards and the employer did not ensure that the platform did not exceed a height of less than 20 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3741

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:    On or about, August 24, 2016 employees working from the platform of a ladder jack scaffold were exposed to fall hazards and the employer did not ensure that the scaffold was inspected by a competent person before the scaffold was used.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.453 B02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2672.00 · Current $1336.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(iv): Employee(s) were not standing firmly on the floor of the basket, were sitting or climbing on the edge of the basket, or were using planks, ladders, or other devices for a work position:    On or about August 24, 2016 an employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 21.5 feet while standing in wooden box attached to the front of the basket of an aerial left and the employer did not ensure that all employees utilizing the lift were standing firmly on the floor of the basket.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1336
  • — Z (S) $2672

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3741.00 · Current $1870.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt with lanyard attached to the boom or basket was not worn by employee(s) working from an aerial lift:    On or about August 24, 2016, an employee was exposed to fall hazards while working from an aerial lift and the employer did not ensure that the employee was protected from the fall hazard by a utilizing a body belt with a lanyard attached to the basket.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1870
  • — Z (S) $3741

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341723377.