Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: POOK, DIEMONT & OHL INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of POOK, DIEMONT & OHL INC. in 701 132ND STREET, BRONX, NY 10454 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 341737294.

Watch Pook, Diemont & OHL INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Pook, Diemont & OHL INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
701 132ND STREET
City
BRONX
State
NY
ZIP
10454
Mailing
701 132ND STREET, BRONX, NY 10454
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238990
Employees
20
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $6236.00 · Current $5000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent):    a)  Production Area:   Employees were exposed to a fall hazard as they retrieved various materials from an elevated storage area that was not guarded by standard railing (or equivalent); on or about 8/3/16.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $6236

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3741.00 · Current $2000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    a) Production Areas:  Two employees who performed welding on mild steel and aluminum parts used powered air purifying respirators and the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program; on or about 8/3/16.    b) Production Areas:  Employees performing spray painting were required to use P95 filtering facepiece respirators or half-face air purifying respirator with combination P100 filters with organic vapor cartridges and the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program; on or about 8/3/16.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $3741

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a) Welding Areas:   Two employees who performed welding on mild steel and aluminum parts used powered air purifying respirators and the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the ability of those employees to use respiratory protection; on o r about 8/3/16.    b) Spray Painting Area:   Employees performing spray painting were required to use either P95 filtering facepiece respirators or half-face air purifying respirator with combination P100 filters with organic vapor cartridges and the employer did not  provide a medical evaluation to determine the ability of those employees to use respiratory protection; on or about 8/3/16.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  a) Welding Areas:   Two employees who performed welding on mild steel and aluminum parts used powered air purifying respirators and the employer did not provide fit testing prior to initial use; on or about 8/3/16.    b) Spray Painting Area:   Employees performing spray painting were required to use either P95 filtering facepiece respirators or half-face air purifying respirators with combination P100 filters with organic vapor cartridges and the employer did not provide fit testing prior to initial use; on or about 8/3/16.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.252 B02 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4988.00 · Current $3000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(iii): Workers and other persons adjacent to the welding area were not required to wear appropriate goggles to protect them from the rays when noncombustible or flameproof screens or shields were not used to enclose the welding operation:    a)  Production Areas:   The MIG welding operations were not enclosed by flameproof screens or shields and workers adjacent to the welding area were not required to wear appropriate eye protection (e.g., shaded goggles or equivalent); on or about 9/28/16.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $4988

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341737294.