Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JEFF DONITHAN

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of JEFF DONITHAN in 1007 OAK CREEK RD., MAHOMET, IL 61853 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341747038.

Watch Jeff Donithan — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jeff Donithan is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JEFF DONITHAN
Site address
1007 OAK CREEK RD.
City
MAHOMET
State
IL
ZIP
61853
Mailing
404 E. GREEN ST., URBANA, IL 61803
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $305.00 · Current $305.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  On December 8, 2016, Jeff Donithan, was issued citations and the employer did not verify, through written certification that each citation was abated.  Abatement certification was not received for the following violations:              a.  Citation 1 Item 1b and,          b.  Citation 1 Item 2a.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $305

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $305.00 · Current $305.00
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:  On December 8, 2016, Jeff Donithan was issued citations and the employer did not verify, through documents that each citation was abated.  Abatement documentation was not received for the following violations:              Citation 1 Item 3b - c.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $305

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2672.00 · Current $2672.00
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:     On or about September 1, 2016, Employees were exposed to falls and struck by hazards on a construction site in Mahomet, Illinois, and the employer did not have an effective safety and health program with specific work rules, competent person oversight, and employee training to govern employees activities.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2672

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s)     On or about September 1, 2016, Employees were exposed to falls and struck by hazards on a construction site in Mahomet, Illinois, and the employer did not ensure a competent person inspected the job site for unsafe activity and took necessary steps to eliminate or control the hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2672.00 · Current $2672.00
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:     On or about September 1, 2016, Employees were exposed to struck-by hazards in the eye while using a pneumatic nail gun, on a construction site in Mahomet, Illinois, and the employer had not instructed the employees in hazard recognition and the applicable regulations to their work environment.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2672

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.    On or about September 1, 2016, , Employees were exposed to struck-by hazards in the eye while using a pneumatic nail gun, on a construction site in Mahomet, Illinois, and the employer did not ensure the use of eye protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3741.00 · Current $3741.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system.      On or about September 1, 2016, , Employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 22ft and 25ft., on a construction site in Mahomet, Illinois, because the employer did not ensure employees were using fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3741

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:      On or about September 1, 2016, Employees were exposed to fall hazards on a construction site in Mahomet, Illinois, and the employer did not instructed the employees in hazard recognition and the applicable regulations to their work environment.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1):  The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record containing the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employee:     On or about September 1, 2016, The employer did not maintain documentation of the required training for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards.  There was no written documentation that included the employees name, date of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employee.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341747038.