Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JMR COATING SYSTEMS, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JMR COATING SYSTEMS, INC. in 5214 98TH STREET, LUBBOCK, TX 79424 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 341823128.

Watch JMR Coating Systems, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for JMR Coating Systems, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5214 98TH STREET
City
LUBBOCK
State
TX
ZIP
79424
Mailing
2510 53RD STREET, LUBBOCK, TX 79413
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2138.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:    JMR Coating Systems, Inc. d/b/a: JMR Construction & Coating Systems did not ensure employees, engaged in masonry operations, were provided an accident prevention program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $2138

1926.59

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3741.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.59: 29 CFR 1926.59:  An employer engaged in construction activities did not comply with the requirements set forth in Part 1910, Section 1200, Hazard Communication:    The employer did not ensure employees engaged in masonry work were provided Hazard Communication while working with materials and exposed to adverse health effects.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $3741

1926.102 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2138.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical agents.   Employees engaged in masonry operations were exposed to struck-by hazards while operating a masonry saw without eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2138

1926.104 A

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2138.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.104(a): Lifelines, safety belts, and lanyards were not used only for employee safeguarding. Any lifeline, safety belt, or lanyard actually subjected to in-service loading, as distinguished from static load testing, was not immediately removed from service and will not be used again for employee safeguarding.  The employer did not ensure lanyards were only used for safeguarding employees and exposed them to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2138

1926.451 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2138.00 · Current $2138.00
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1)(i): Each platform unit (e.g., scaffold plank, fabricated plank, fabricated deck, or fabricated platform) was not installed so that the space between adjacent units and the space between the platform and the uprights were no more than 1 inch (2.5 cm) wide, except where the employer can demonstrate that a wider space is necessary.    The employer did not ensure the space between each platform on a scaffold was less than one inch wide and exposed employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2138
  • — Z (S) $2138

1926.451 E02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2138.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(2)(iv): Hook-on and attachable ladders were not specifically designed for use with the type of scaffold used;    The employer did not ensure ladders used on scaffolds were designed for those scaffolds and exposed employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2138

1926.451 B04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2138.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(4): Each end of a platform, not cleated or otherwise restrained by hooks or equivalent means, did not extend over the centerline of its support at least 6 inches (15 cm):    The employer did not ensure each platform end was not extended over its support at least six inches and exposed employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2138

1926.451 H01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3741.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(1): Each employee on a scaffold was not provided with additional protection from falling hand tools, debris, and other small objects through the installation of toeboards, screens, guardrail systems, or through the erection of debris nets, catch platforms, or canopy structures that contain or deflect the falling objects.  For falling objects too large, heavy or massive to be contained or deflected, the employer did not place and secure such potential falling objects away from the edge of the surface from which they could fall.    Employees, of JMR Construction & Coating Systems, working underneath and/or around a scaffold, without toeboards, were exposed to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3741

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3741.00 · Current $3741.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.  Employees without fall protection were engaged in masonry work and exposed to fall hazards of more than six feet while moving and holding materials on the roof of the structure.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3741
  • — Z (S) $3741

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3207.00 · Current $3207.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    Employees engaged in masonry work were exposed to fall hazards while using a ladder that did not extend at least three feet above the roof's landing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3207
  • — Z (S) $3207

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1604.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were used for purposes other than the purposes for which they were designed:    An employee performing masonry work was exposed to a fall hazard while working from an A-frame ladder that was leaned against a wall.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $1604

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2138.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.    The employer did not ensure employees performing masonry work from ladders were trained to recognize hazards related to ladders and the procedures to follow that would minimize the hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2138

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341823128.