LOVELAND, OH —
OSHA Inspection: SST PRECISION MANUFACTURING INC.
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of SST PRECISION MANUFACTURING INC. in 119 NORTHEAST DR, LOVELAND, OH 45140 (NAICS 331521). OSHA activity number 341836120.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SST PRECISION MANUFACTURING INC.
- Site address
- 119 NORTHEAST DR
- City
- LOVELAND
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45140
- Mailing
- 154 COMMERCE BLVDR., LOVELAND, OH 45140
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 331521
- Employees
- 20
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 E
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4988.00 · Current $3492.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(e): The employer did not remove from service defective or damaged personal protective equipment: a.) On 10/12/2016, in the aluminum foundry, the employer did not ensure that aluminized coats worn by employees were free from damage in that the aluminized coats had holes where molten metal could splash. b.) On 10/12/2016, in the aluminum foundry, the employer did not ensure that a face shield worn by employees was free from damage in that the face shield had an opening where molten metal could splash.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3491.6
- — Z (S) $4988
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3741.00 · Current $2619.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: On 10/12/2016, the employer required employees to wear dust masks when sanding and grinding aluminum pieces and did not establish or implement a written respiratory protection program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2618.7
- — Z (S) $3741
1910.134 D01 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(ii): The employer did not select and use a NIOSH-certified respirator in compliance with the conditions of its certification: On 10/12/2016, in the aluminum foundry, the employer required the use of dust masks which were not NIOSH approved while employees were sanding and grinding aluminum pieces.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: On 10/12/2016, the employer required the use of N95 dust masks while sanding and grinding and did not ensure that employees received fit-testing.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary: On 10/12/2016, the employer required respirator use for employees who sand and grind aluminum parts and did not provide training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3741.00 · Current $2619.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: On or about 10/12/2016, in the aluminum foundry, the employer did not provide adequate eyewash facilities or a shower when employees were exposed to a corrosive floor cleaner (Hydroclean FC-305) and a severe eye irritant (Griflube Aquatech FR-200 hydraulic fluid).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2618.7
- — Z (S) $3741
1910.242 B
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3741.00 · Current $2619.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.: On 10/12/2016, in the aluminum foundry, a production employee was using a compressed air nozzle to clean dust and aluminum particles off of a press and the nozzle used was not reduced to 30 p.s.i.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2618.7
- — Z (S) $3741
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4988.00 · Current $3492.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: On or about 10/12/2016, the employer did not develop, implement, or maintain a written hazard communication program for employees who were required to use chemicals such as compressed acetylene (flammable) and hydraulic fluid (corrosive).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3491.6
- — Z (S) $4988
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not ensure that safety data sheets were readily accessible to the employees in their work area during each work shift: On or about 10/12/2016, in the aluminum foundry, the employer did not ensure that safety data sheets (SDSs) were readily accessible to the employees in their work area during each work shift in that SDSs were not kept by the employer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: On or about 10/12/2016, the employer did not provide information and training for employees who were required to use chemicals such as compressed acetylene (flammable) and hydraulic fluid (corrosive).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed: On or about 10/12/2016, in the aluminum foundry, the employer did not verify in writing that a workplace hazard assessment had been performed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 331521)
WABASH, IN—2026-04-29
WABASH CASTINGS INCORPORATED
SPOKANE, WA—2026-03-25
WA317990447 - TRAVIS PATTERN & FOUNDRY INC
RUTHERFORDTON, NC—2026-01-28
160418 - AALLIED DIE CASTING COMPANY OF NORTH CAROLINA
HENDERSON, KY—2025-05-28
68020 - GIBBS DIE CASTING CORPORATION
SPOKANE, WA—2025-04-30
WA317985803 - TRAVIS PATTERN & FOUNDRY INC
More inspections in OH
WELLINGTON, OH—2026-07-16
WHIRLAWAY CORPORATION
WAUSEON, OH—2026-07-16
WATSON WELL DRILLING INC.
SEVEN HILLS, OH—2026-07-15
STONEY ACRES BUILDERS LLC
SEVEN HILLS, OH—2026-07-15
GRB ENTERPRISES LLC
CHILLICOTHE, OH—2026-07-15
KENWORTH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341836120.