Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: SST PRECISION MANUFACTURING INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of SST PRECISION MANUFACTURING INC. in 119 NORTHEAST DR, LOVELAND, OH 45140 (NAICS 331521). OSHA activity number 341836120.

Watch SST Precision Manufacturing INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for SST Precision Manufacturing INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
119 NORTHEAST DR
City
LOVELAND
State
OH
ZIP
45140
Mailing
154 COMMERCE BLVDR., LOVELAND, OH 45140
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
331521
Employees
20
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 E

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4988.00 · Current $3492.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(e): The employer did not remove from service defective or damaged personal protective equipment:  a.) On 10/12/2016, in the aluminum foundry, the employer did not ensure that aluminized coats worn by employees were free from damage in that the aluminized coats had holes where molten metal could splash.     b.) On 10/12/2016, in the aluminum foundry, the employer did not ensure that a face shield worn by employees was free from damage in that the face shield had an opening where molten metal could splash.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3491.6
  • — Z (S) $4988

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3741.00 · Current $2619.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  On 10/12/2016, the employer required employees to wear dust masks when sanding and grinding aluminum pieces and did not establish or implement a written respiratory protection program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2618.7
  • — Z (S) $3741

1910.134 D01 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(ii): The employer did not select and use a NIOSH-certified respirator in compliance with the conditions of its certification:  On 10/12/2016, in the aluminum foundry, the employer required the use of dust masks which were not NIOSH approved while employees were sanding and grinding aluminum pieces.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  On 10/12/2016, the employer required the use of N95 dust masks while sanding and grinding and did not ensure that employees received fit-testing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:  On 10/12/2016, the employer required respirator use for employees who sand and grind aluminum parts and did not provide training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3741.00 · Current $2619.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:  On or about 10/12/2016, in the aluminum foundry, the employer did not provide adequate eyewash facilities or a shower when employees were exposed to a corrosive floor cleaner (Hydroclean FC-305) and a severe eye irritant (Griflube Aquatech FR-200 hydraulic fluid).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2618.7
  • — Z (S) $3741

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3741.00 · Current $2619.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.:  On 10/12/2016, in the aluminum foundry, a production employee was using a compressed air nozzle to clean dust and aluminum particles off of a press and the nozzle used was not reduced to 30 p.s.i.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2618.7
  • — Z (S) $3741

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4988.00 · Current $3492.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  On or about 10/12/2016, the employer did not develop, implement, or maintain a written hazard communication program for employees who were required to use chemicals such as compressed acetylene (flammable) and hydraulic fluid (corrosive).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3491.6
  • — Z (S) $4988

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not ensure that safety data sheets were readily accessible to the employees in their work area during each work shift:  On or about 10/12/2016, in the aluminum foundry, the employer did not ensure that safety data sheets (SDSs) were readily accessible to the employees in their work area during each work shift in that SDSs were not kept by the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  On or about 10/12/2016, the employer did not provide information and training for employees who were required to use chemicals such as compressed acetylene (flammable) and hydraulic fluid (corrosive).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:  On or about 10/12/2016, in the aluminum foundry, the employer did not verify in writing that a workplace hazard assessment had been performed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341836120.