OSHA Inspection: HTHP LEASING, LLC.

Issued

2017-05-09 00:00:00

Abate by

2017-05-19 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $406.00 · Current $406.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  Workplace at 210 Main Street, Hackensack, NJ: The employer did not submit certification within 10 calendar days from the abatement date to certify that the cited violations had been abated, on or about 01/10/17.

Issued

2016-11-10 00:00:00

Abate by

2016-12-30 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3563.00 · Current $2494.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a)  Workplace at 210 Main Street, Hackensack, NJ: Employees were required to wear a negative pressure air purifying respirator (3M, P-100) during demolition of building material. The employer did not develop and implement a worksite-specific written respiratory protection program, on or about 04/19/16.

Issued

2016-11-10 00:00:00

Abate by

2016-12-08 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (Construction Reference 1926.103): Note:  The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.   a) Workplace at 210 Main Street, Hackensack, NJ: The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to those required to wear a negative pressure air-purifying respirator, on or about 04/19/16.

Issued

2016-11-10 00:00:00

Abate by

2016-12-30 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3563.00 · Current $2494.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (Construction Reference: 1926.59):    a) Workplace at 210 Main Street, Hackensack, NJ: Employees demolish building material which contains silica dust.  The employer did not develop and implement a worksite specific written hazard communication program,  on or about 04/19/16.

Issued

2016-11-10 00:00:00

Abate by

2016-12-08 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (Construction Reference: 1926.59).   a) Worksite at 210 Main Street, Hackensack, NJ: Demolition employees were not provided the information and training on the hazard(s) associated with exposure to silica dust, on or about 04/19/16.