Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JOSILEI MIRANDA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOSILEI MIRANDA in 140 PICKERINGTON PONDS DRIVE, PICKERINGTON, OH 43147 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 341909174.

Watch Josilei Miranda — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Josilei Miranda is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JOSILEI MIRANDA
Site address
140 PICKERINGTON PONDS DRIVE
City
PICKERINGTON
State
OH
ZIP
43147
Mailing
4879 KINGSHILL DRIVE, COLUMBUS, OH 43229
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2672.00 · Current $2672.00
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.   a. Located at 140 Pickerington Ponds Drive in Pickerington, Ohio: On or about November 15, 2016, an employee was operating a pneumatic nailer to attach sheathing to the roof trusses without eye protection, exposing the employee to a struck by hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2672

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3741.00 · Current $3741.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.   a. Located at 140 Pickerington Ponds Drive in Pickerington, Ohio: On or about November 15, 2016, and days prior, employees were installing wooden trusses, truss bracing, and sheathing without fall protection, exposing employees to an approximately twenty foot fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3741

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341909174.