MARYSVILLE, OH —
OSHA Inspection: E AND V BUILDERS, LLC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of E AND V BUILDERS, LLC. in 747 CLYDESDALE WAY, MARYSVILLE, OH 43040 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 341911451.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- E AND V BUILDERS, LLC.
- Site address
- 747 CLYDESDALE WAY
- City
- MARYSVILLE
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 43040
- Mailing
- 205 WALKER ROAD, COMMERCIAL POINT, OH 43116
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.404 B01 III C
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1604.00 · Current $1604.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(iii)(C): Each cord set, attachment cap, plug and receptacle of cord sets, and any equipment connected by cord and plug, except cord sets and receptacles which are fixed and not exposed to damage, shall be visually inspected before each day's use for external defects, such as deformed or missing pins or insulation damage, and for indications of possible internal damage. Equipment found damaged or defective shall not be used until repaired. a. On or before November 15, 2016, where an employee was using a reciprocating saw to cut lumber, the insulating cord of the saw damaged throughout the length of the cord, thereby exposing the employee to a 125 volt electrical contact hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1604
1926.405 A02 II J
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1604.00 · Current $1604.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(J): Extension cord sets used with portable electric tools and appliances shall be of three-wire type and shall be designed for hard or extra-hard usage. Flexible cords used with temporary and portable lights shall be designed for hard or extra-hard usage. NOTE: The National Electrical Code, ANSI/NFPA 70, in Article 400, Table 400-4, lists various types of flexible cords, some of which are noted as being designed for hard or extra-hard usage. Examples of these types of flexible cords include hard service cord (types S, ST, SO, STO) and junior hard service cord (types SJ, SJO, SJT, SJTO). a. On or before November 15, 2016, where an employee was using a two wire extension cord to provide power to a circular saw, the extension cord was not rated for hard or extra hard usage.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1604
1926.405 G02 IV
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1604.00 · Current $1604.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Strain relief. Flexible cords shall be connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided which will prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws. a. On or before November 15, 2016, where an employee was using an extension cord to provide electrical power to a reciprocating saw to cut lumber during framing, the outer insulation of the cord was pulled away from the plug exposing interior conductors, thereby exposing employees to a 125 volt electrical contact hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1604
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2672.00 · Current $2672.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. a. On or before November 15, 2016, where an employee was working from the first story roof of the house, the employee was not protected from falls, thereby being exposed to a 12 foot fall hazard. b. On or before November 15, 2016, where an employee was framing a two story house, the stairway was not guarded, thereby exposing the employee to a 10 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2672
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
FAIRHOPE, AL—2026-07-16
FRANCISCO ARES
WOODHAVEN, MI—2026-07-16
G.J. PERELLI CO., L.L.C.
PHILADELPHIA, PA—2026-07-16
URUS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
BERLIN, NJ—2026-07-16
URUS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
MERIDIAN, ID—2026-07-15
TRIPLE R CONSTRUCTION LLC
More inspections in OH
WELLINGTON, OH—2026-07-16
WHIRLAWAY CORPORATION
WAUSEON, OH—2026-07-16
WATSON WELL DRILLING INC.
SEVEN HILLS, OH—2026-07-15
STONEY ACRES BUILDERS LLC
SEVEN HILLS, OH—2026-07-15
GRB ENTERPRISES LLC
CHILLICOTHE, OH—2026-07-15
KENWORTH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341911451.