Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JULIO DAVID LEOS

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JULIO DAVID LEOS in 20434 KUYKENDAHL ROAD, SPRING, TX 77379 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 341986594.

Watch Julio David Leos — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Julio David Leos is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JULIO DAVID LEOS
Site address
20434 KUYKENDAHL ROAD
City
SPRING
State
TX
ZIP
77379
Mailing
1411 OAKENGATES DR., HOUSTON, TX 77015
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2672.00 · Current $1603.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1)(i): Each platform unit (e.g., scaffold plank, fabricated plank, fabricated deck, or fabricated platform) was not installed so that the space between adjacent units and the space between the platform and the uprights were no more than 1 inch (2.5 cm) wide, except where the employer can demonstrate that a wider space is necessary.    On or about December 20, 2016, on the west side of a newly built commercial building, employees were exposed to a fall hazard exceeding ten feet when performing masonry work from fabricated frame scaffolding that was not fully decked between the uprights.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1603.2
  • — Z (S) $2672

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2138.00 · Current $1283.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access.    On or about December 20, 2016, on the west side of a newly built commercial building, employees were exposed to a fall hazard exceeding ten feet when performing masonry work from fabricated frame scaffolding without a safe means of access.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1282.8
  • — Z (S) $2138

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3741.00 · Current $2245.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:    On or about December 20, 2016, on the west side of a newly built commercial building, employees were exposed to a fall hazard exceeding ten feet when performing masonry work from fabricated frame scaffolding without a fall protection system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2244.6
  • — Z (S) $3741

1926.451 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1604.00 · Current $962.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(1): Each employee on a scaffold was not provided with additional protection from falling hand tools, debris, and other small objects through the installation of toeboards, screens, guardrail systems, or through the erection of debris nets, catch platforms, or canopy structures that contain or deflect the falling objects.  For falling objects too large, heavy or massive to be contained or deflected, the employer did not place and secure such potential falling objects away from the edge of the surface from which they could fall.    On or about December 20, 2016, on the west side of a newly built commercial building, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when performing masonry work from fabricated frame scaffolding without toeboards or other means erected to protect employees from falling objects.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $962.4
  • — Z (S) $1604

1926.452 C02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3741.00 · Current $2245.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(2): Tubular welded frames and panels were not braced by cross, horizontal, or diagonal braces, or combination thereof, which would have secured vertical members together laterally:    On or about December 20, 2016, on the west side of a newly built commercial building, employees were exposed to a fall hazard exceeding ten feet when performing masonry work from fabricated frame scaffolding without the frames and panels being braced by cross, horizontal, or diagonal braces.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2244.6
  • — Z (S) $3741

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program which at included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): (Construction Reference: 1926.59)   On or about December 20, 2016, and times prior thereto, on the west side of a newly constructed commercial building where employees were allowed to use hazardous materials without a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341986594.