Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: DOOLITTLE TRAILER MFG

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DOOLITTLE TRAILER MFG in 2455 DOOLITTLE DRIVE, HOLTS SUMMIT, MO 65043 (NAICS 333924). OSHA activity number 341997617.

Watch Doolittle Trailer MFG — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Doolittle Trailer MFG is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2455 DOOLITTLE DRIVE
City
HOLTS SUMMIT
State
MO
ZIP
65043
Mailing
2455 DOOLITTLE DRIVE, HOLTS SUMMIT, MO 65043
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333924
Employees
120
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $8017.00 · Current $3430.00 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1):     Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employee(s) in that employee(s) were exposed to the hazard of being caught-in:    Inside of the North Plant, employee(s) were exposed to an amputation/laceration hazard due to a possible machine process malfunction on the following equipment:    a/  Niagara Shear, m/n 15-111, s/n 812.    One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to install emergency stop devices as required by ANSI B11.4-2003, paragraph 6.2.4.4.    DISCLAIMER:    a/  The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA.  b/  The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3430
  • — Z (S) $8017

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1):   Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employee(s) in that employee(s) were exposed to the hazard of being caught-in:  Inside of the North Plant, employee(s) were exposed to an amputation/laceration hazard due to a possible machine process malfunction on the following equipment:  a/  Niagara Shear, m/n 15-111, s/n 812.  One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to install a cover over the treadle bar as required by ANSI B11.4-2003, paragraph 6.3.3.3.  DISCLAIMER:  a/  The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b/  The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1):   Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employee(s) in that employee(s) were exposed to the hazard of being caught-in:  Inside of the North Plant, employee(s) were exposed to an amputation/laceration hazard due to an accidental actuation on the following equipment:  a/  Economy Baler, m/n 6031, s/n 58735.  One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to install a cover over the treadle bar as required by ANSI Z245.5-2004, paragraph 5.3.2.  DISCLAIMER:  a/  The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b/  The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $8017.00 · Current $3430.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i):  Procedures were not developed, documented, and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    Specific procedures were not developed, documented, or utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy belonging to the following machinery:    a/  Niagara Shear, m/n 15-111, s/n 815.    b/  Toyota Fork Truck, m/n 28822, unknown s/n.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3430
  • — Z (S) $8017

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $8017.00 · Current $3430.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii):  Point(s) of operation (P.O.O.) of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):    a/  Inside of the North Plant, the P.O.O. belonging to the punch attached to the Scotchman Ironworker, m/n 6600, s/n 2684M18, was unguarded.      b/  Inside of the Baler Area, the P.O.O. belonging to the Economy Vertical Baler, m/n 6031, s/n 58735, was unguarded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3430
  • — Z (S) $8017

1910.252 B02 III

Serious Gravity 5 10 instances 40 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $8017.00 · Current $3430.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(iii): Workers and other persons adjacent to the welding area were not required to wear appropriate goggles, to protect them from the rays when noncombustible or flameproof screens or shields were not used:    a/  Inside of the North Plant, employees walking by a number of MIG Welding Stations were not protected from the rays by flameproof screens or the equivalent.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3430
  • — Z (S) $8017

1910.303 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $8017.00 · Current $3430.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1): Sufficient access and working space was not provided and maintained about all electric equipment (operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground) to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment:    a/  At the Baler Area, the 240 volt electric disconnect switch used to power the Economy Baler, m/n 6031, s/n 58735, was blocked by multiple wire mesh containers placed there in storage.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3430
  • — Z (S) $8017

1910.305 G01 IV B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(B): Unless specifically permitted otherwise in paragraph (g)(1)(ii) of this section, flexible cords and cables were used to run through walls, ceilings, and floors:  a/  At the Baler Area, one, orange, flexible cord ran through the sheet metal wall of the building to power an oil heating unit belonging to the Economy Baler, m/n 6031, s/n 58735.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.332 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $8017.00 · Current $3430.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1):  Employee(s) were not trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertain to their respective job assignments:    a/  Employee(s) replaced a 20 ampere circuit breaker belonging to Panel G located inside of the Cargo Finish Department, North Plant.  The employee(s) were not trained in the safety-related work practices necessary to prevent an arc flash hazard from occurring or to minimize injury through adequate personal protective equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3430
  • — Z (S) $8017

1910.335 A01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $8017.00 · Current $3420.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i):  Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with, and did not use, electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body to be protected and for the work to be performed:    a/  Inside of the North Plant, specifically at the Cargo Finish Department, employee(s) performing maintenance on Panel G, a circuit breaker panel box, were not provided with suitable electrical protective equipment.  The employee(s) wore only a face shield and leather gloves while testing Panel G to determine if electrical energy was present.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3420
  • — Z (S) $8017

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341997617.