Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: OHIO ANODIZING COMPANY, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of OHIO ANODIZING COMPANY, INC. in 915 NORTH 20TH STREET, COLUMBUS, OH 43219 (NAICS 332813). OSHA activity number 342044724.

Watch Ohio Anodizing Company, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ohio Anodizing Company, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
915 NORTH 20TH STREET
City
COLUMBUS
State
OH
ZIP
43219
Mailing
915 NORTH 20TH STREET, COLUMBUS, OH 43219
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332813
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2173.00 · Current $1304.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): Energy control program. The employer shall establish a program consisting of energy control procedures, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performs any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative.    a. At the workplace, the employer did not establish an energy control program to protect employees from the unexpected energization, startup, or release of stored energy during maintenance activities such as changing pumps and motors.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1303.8
  • — Z (S) $2173

1910.178 L02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2173.00 · Current $1304.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): Training shall consist of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace.      a. At the workplace, the employer did not ensure that each employee operating a forklift had successfully completed the required formal instruction portion of the forklift operator training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1303.8
  • — Z (S) $2173

1910.178 L04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(i): Refresher training, including an evaluation of the effectiveness of that training, shall be conducted as required by paragraph (l)(4)(ii) to ensure that the operator has the knowledge and skills needed to operate the powered industrial truck safely.    a. At the workplace, the employer did not ensure refresher training was conducted for forklift operators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2173.00 · Current $1304.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following:    a. At the workplace, the employer did not develop and implement a hazard communication program for employees exposed to chemicals such as, but not limited to, sulfuric acid and phosphoric acid while anodizing metal parts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1303.8
  • — Z (S) $2173

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment.    a. At the workplace, the employer did not verify that the workplace hazard assessment was performed through a written certification.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342044724.