COLUMBUS, OH —
OSHA Inspection: OHIO ANODIZING COMPANY, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of OHIO ANODIZING COMPANY, INC. in 915 NORTH 20TH STREET, COLUMBUS, OH 43219 (NAICS 332813). OSHA activity number 342044724.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- OHIO ANODIZING COMPANY, INC.
- Site address
- 915 NORTH 20TH STREET
- City
- COLUMBUS
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 43219
- Mailing
- 915 NORTH 20TH STREET, COLUMBUS, OH 43219
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332813
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2173.00 · Current $1304.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): Energy control program. The employer shall establish a program consisting of energy control procedures, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performs any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative. a. At the workplace, the employer did not establish an energy control program to protect employees from the unexpected energization, startup, or release of stored energy during maintenance activities such as changing pumps and motors.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1303.8
- — Z (S) $2173
1910.178 L02 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2173.00 · Current $1304.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): Training shall consist of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace. a. At the workplace, the employer did not ensure that each employee operating a forklift had successfully completed the required formal instruction portion of the forklift operator training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1303.8
- — Z (S) $2173
1910.178 L04 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(i): Refresher training, including an evaluation of the effectiveness of that training, shall be conducted as required by paragraph (l)(4)(ii) to ensure that the operator has the knowledge and skills needed to operate the powered industrial truck safely. a. At the workplace, the employer did not ensure refresher training was conducted for forklift operators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2173.00 · Current $1304.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employers shall develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met, and which also includes the following: a. At the workplace, the employer did not develop and implement a hazard communication program for employees exposed to chemicals such as, but not limited to, sulfuric acid and phosphoric acid while anodizing metal parts.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1303.8
- — Z (S) $2173
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment. a. At the workplace, the employer did not verify that the workplace hazard assessment was performed through a written certification.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332813)
JEFFERSON, OH—2026-07-10
LAKE CITY PLATING LLC
WARSAW, IN—2026-07-08
SURFACE ENHANCEMENTS
KENT, WA—2026-07-06
WA317991930 - HYTEK FINISHES CO
PHOENIX, AZ—2026-06-24
CPX2026XTP177X0010 - FRONTIER GROUP, INC.
MELROSE PARK, IL—2026-06-24
NATIONAL PLATING SOLUTIONS LLC DBA SOMERVILLE PLATING
More inspections in OH
OXFORD, OH—2026-07-13
R&R SIDING LLC
CONNEAUT, OH—2026-07-13
CONTINENTAL STRUCTURAL PLASTICS
CAMDEN, OH—2026-07-13
ALBERTO MORALES
HARRISON, OH—2026-07-10
WEBER FAMILY FARMS LLC
JEFFERSON, OH—2026-07-10
LAKE CITY PLATING LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342044724.