Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

FORT WORTH, TX —

OSHA Inspection: FOAMASTER INSULATION

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

At a glance

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of FOAMASTER INSULATION in 360 MESA GRANDE DR., FORT WORTH, TX 76101 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 342063997.

Watch Foamaster Insulation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Foamaster Insulation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

Where did this inspection happen?

Establishment
FOAMASTER INSULATION
Site address
360 MESA GRANDE DR.
City
FORT WORTH
State
TX
ZIP
76101
Mailing
360 MESA GRANDE DR., FORT WORTH, TX 76101

What kind of inspection was it?

Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B

When did the case open and close?

Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded

Establishment context

NAICS code
238310
Employees
11
Ownership type
A

Citations

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1662.00 · Current $997.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   At the site, employees using 3M and Honeywell full face and half mask air purifying respirators during foam process operations were not medical evaluated prior to initial use of the respirator. Employees were potentially exposed to physiological hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $997.2
  • — Z (S) $1662

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1662.00 · Current $997.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter   At the site, employees using Honeywell and 3M full face and  half mask air purifying respirators during foam process operations were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator and at least annually thereafter. Employees were exposed to a mixture of vapors such as, but not limited to polymeric diphenylmethane diisocyanate.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $997.2
  • — Z (S) $1662

1910.134 H02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1662.00 · Current $997.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or  were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve:   At the site, the employer did not ensure that respirators were stored properly. Employees were exposed to dermatitis and/or skin irritation hazards when storing 3M and Honeywell air purifying respirators inside of the trailer on a hook.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $997.2
  • — Z (S) $1662

More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238310)

More inspections in TX

Source

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342063997.