Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: BRIERTON ENGINEERING, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BRIERTON ENGINEERING, INC. in 1200 S. BUCKEYE, ABILENE, KS 67410 (NAICS 336350). OSHA activity number 342093812.

Watch Brierton Engineering, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Brierton Engineering, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1200 S. BUCKEYE
City
ABILENE
State
KS
ZIP
67410
Mailing
P.O. BOX 217, ABILENE, KS 67410
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336350
Employees
26
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 B05 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 26 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6338.00 · Current $3169.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(iv): Space within the spray booth on the downstream and upstream sides of filters were not protected with approved automatic sprinklers:  Employees engaged in painting activities in the fab area were exposed to fire and explosion hazards in that the spray paint booth was not protected with automatic sprinklers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3169
  • — Z (S) $6338

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6338.00 · Current $3169.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  Employees engaged in painting activities in the fab area paint booth were exposed to chemical hazards associated with the use of paint and paint products in that a written respiratory protection program had not been developed and implemented.  Employees were required to wear respirators for job tasks such as spray painting.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3169
  • — Z (S) $6338

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable, and effective annual training to employees who were required to use respirators:  Employees engaged in painting activities in the fab area paint booth were exposed to chemical hazards in that the painters were not provided adequate training on the proper use and care of respirators used at the facility.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3802.00 · Current $1901.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employees required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  Employees engaged in painting activities in the paint booth were exposed to inhalation hazards, including paint fumes, in that they were not fit tested before using the 3M half mask respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1901
  • — Z (S) $3802

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): The employer did not prohibit the growth of facial hair of employees using tight fitting face piece respirators which would prevent a seal between the face piece and the face:  Employees engaged in painting activities in the paint booth were exposed to chemical hazards in that employees required to wear 3 M tight fitting half face respirators during spray painting activities were not prohibited from growing facial hair.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 F06

Other-than-serious 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the information specified under paragraphs (f)(6)(i) through (ii) of this section:  Spray bottles of coolant in the assembly area were not labeled or marked to identify the product.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View BRIERTON ENGINEERING, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342093812.