Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: HOUSTON OILFIELD EQUIPMENT, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of HOUSTON OILFIELD EQUIPMENT, INC. in 9669 PORT ERROLL DR., HOUSTON, TX 77095 (NAICS 333132). OSHA activity number 342105434.

Watch Houston Oilfield Equipment, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Houston Oilfield Equipment, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
9669 PORT ERROLL DR.
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77095
Mailing
9669 PORT ERROLL DR., HOUSTON, TX 77095
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333132
Employees
14
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 B05 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3622.00 · Current $2173.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(iv): Space within the spray booth on the downstream and upstream sides of filters were not protected with approved automatic sprinklers:       On or about February 14, 2017, located in the shop where an employee was exposed to fire hazards when performing painting tasks in a spray booth without an automatic sprinkler.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2173.2
  • — Z (S) $3622

1910.107 B10

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3622.00 · Current $2173.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(10): Transparent panels used for illumination of spray booth(s) did not effectively isolate the spraying area from the area in which the lighting unit(s) were located:        On or about February 14, 2017, located in the shop where an employee was exposed to fire hazards when performing painting tasks in a spray booth without a cover on one of the lighting panels.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2173.2
  • — Z (S) $3622

1910.134 C02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2897.00 · Current $1738.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:      On or about February 14, 2017, located in the shop where an employee wore a 3M half-face respirator with organic vapor cartridges on a voluntary basis when performing painting tasks without the employer developing necessary elements of a respirator program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1738.2
  • — Z (S) $2897

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:      On or about February 14, 2017, located in the shop where an employee wore a 3M half-face respirator with organic vapor cartridges on a voluntary basis when performing painting tasks without having received a medical evaluation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:      On or about May 20, 2015, located in the fabrication shop where a painter wore a 3M half-face respirator with organic vapor cartridges when painting without being provided basic respirator training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2897.00 · Current $1738.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a forklift:       On or about February 15, 2017, at the facility where employees are exposed to crushed-by hazards when operating Komatsu forklifts for moving parts without ensuring employees completed forklift training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1738.2
  • — Z (S) $2897

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3622.00 · Current $2173.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):      On or about February 15, 2017, at the facility where employees were exposed to inhalation and chemical hazards when using chemicals such as, but not limited to, Devlac coating, thinner, cutting fluid, lubricants, and propane without developing a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2173.2
  • — Z (S) $3622

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:           On or about February 15, 2017, at the facility where employees were exposed to inhalation and chemical hazards when using chemicals such as, but not limited to, Devlac coating, thinner, cutting fluid, lubricants, and propane without providing training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342105434.