Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: XYLEM DESIGN

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of XYLEM DESIGN in 309 HICKORY, FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 (NAICS 337215). OSHA activity number 342181641.

Watch Xylem Design — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Xylem Design is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
XYLEM DESIGN
Site address
309 HICKORY
City
FORT COLLINS
State
CO
ZIP
80524
Mailing
309 HICKORY, FORT COLLINS, CO 80524
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
337215
Employees
29
Ownership type
A

25 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3231.00 · Current $2100.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:     (a) Xylem Designs at 309 Hickory St, Fort Collins, CO: On and before March 17, 2017, the employer did not ensure that personal protective equipment or clothing for extremities was provided and used whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered. An employee, who was conducting spray activities in a Brinks paint booth with lacquer and stain dyes, wore shorts, leaving portions of his legs uncovered. This condition exposed the employee to category 2 skin corrosion/irritant chemical hazard.      Abatement Note: If such hazards are present, or likely to be present, the employer shall: Select, and have each affected employee use, the types of PPE that will protect the affected employee from the hazards identified in the hazard assessment; communicate selection decisions to each affected employee; and, select PPE that properly fits each affected employee. Note: Non-mandatory Appendix B contains an example of procedures that would comply with the requirement for a hazard assessment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3231

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 29 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:  (a) Xylem Designs at 309 Hickory St, Fort Collins, CO: On and before March 17, 2017, the employer did not verify, through written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed.  Personal protective equipment provided to employees for activities including but not limited to spray booth and rotocasting activities were not documented in a workplace hazard assessment.  This condition exposed employees to chemical and physical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.138 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes:    (a) Xylem Designs at 309 Hickory St, Fort Collins, CO: On and before March 17, 2017, the employer did not require employees to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards. An employee, who was conducting spray activities in a Brinks paint booth with lacquer and stain dyes, did not use chemically resistant gloves. This condition exposed the employee to category 2 skin corrosion/irritant chemical hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4310.00 · Current $2800.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    (a) Xylem Designs at 309 Hickory St, Fort Collins, CO: On and before March 17, 2017, the employer did not ensure that operators and employees were protected from nine incoming nip points between the rotating roller discs and drum on the south side of the rotocaster. The employer did not ensure that operators and employees were protected from three rotating plastic brackets which were projecting from the east side of the drum on the rotocaster.  These conditions exposed employees to caught between and struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $4310

1910.219 C02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(2)(i): All exposed part(s) of horizontal shafting seven (7) feet or less from floor or working platform were not protected by stationary casing(s) enclosing shafting completely or by trough(s) enclosing sides and top or sides and bottom of shafting:  (a) Xylem Designs at 309 Hickory St, Fort Collins, CO: On and before March 17, 2017, the employer did not ensure that employees and operators were protected from two rotating horizontal shafts on the rotocaster by stationary casings enclosing shafting completely or by troughs enclosing sides and top or sides and bottom of shafting that were protected. This condition exposed employees to caught between hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.219 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(4)(i): Unguarded projecting shaft end(s) did not present a smooth edge end and projected more than one half the diameter of the shaft:  (a) Xylem Designs at 309 Hickory St, Fort Collins, CO: On and before March 17, 2017, the the employer did not ensure that employees and operators were protected from two unguarded projecting shafts ends on the east side of the rotocaster and from two unguarded projecting shafts ends on the west side of the rotocaster, which did not present smooth edges  and projected more than one half the diameter of the shaft. This condition exposed employees to caught between hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.219 E03 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 29 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(3)(i): Vertical or inclined belt(s) were not enclosed by guard(s) conforming to the requirements specified at 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):  (a) Xylem Designs at 309 Hickory St, Fort Collins, CO: On and before March 17, 2017, the employer did not ensure that operators and employees were protected from the incoming nip points on an unguarded belt drive on the rotocaster. This condition exposed employees to caught between hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 29 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3231.00 · Current $2100.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    (a) Xylem Designs at 309 Hickory St, Fort Collins, CO: On and before March 17, 2017, the employer did not develop, implement, and maintain at the workplace a site specific written hazard communication program.  Employees are potentially exposed to hazardous chemicals, including but not limited to the following:    1) Isopropyl Alcohol  2) Acetone  3)  Elastocast T76 (Diphenylmethane-4,4'-diisocyanate)  4) Dye Stain Light Brown (chromium metal)  5) Magnamax Precatalyzed Lacquer (n-butyl acetate, ethanol, 2-propanol, 1-butanol, ethyl acetate)
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3231

1910.1200 F06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 29 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6): Except as provided in paragraphs (f)(7) and (f)(8) of this section, the employer shall ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace is labeled, tagged or marked with either the information specified under paragraphs (f)(1)(i) through (v) of this section for labels on shipped containers; or product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals, and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, will provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical:    (a) Xylem Designs at 309 Hickory St, Fort Collins, CO: On and before March 17, 2017, the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemicals contained within. Plastic secondary chemical squeeze bottles  and plastic secondary chemical containers were being stored in the northwestern corner of the work floor. The chemicals were identified with handwritten labels and a color code system which did not provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals or the information specified under paragraphs (f)(1)(i) through (v) of this section. The chemicals in the secondary containers included but were not limited to lacquer thinner, vinegar, paint thinner, and isopropyl alcohol.    (b) Xylem Designs at 309 Hickory St, Fort Collins, CO: On and before March 17, 2017, the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemicals contained within. Plastic secondary chemicals containers were being stored in the spray booth. The chemicals were identified with handwritten labels which did not provide information specified under paragraphs (f)(1)(i) through (v) of this section. The chemicals in the secondary containers included but were not limited to General Finish Dye Stains with lacquer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 29 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use:  (a) Xylem Designs at 309 Hickory St, Fort Collins, CO: On and before March 17, 2017, the employer did not obtain a safety data sheet each hazardous chemical they used. Employees were only provided material safety data sheets for hazardous chemicals, including but not limited to Klean-Strip Acetone, Diversey Alpha HP Multi-Surface Cleaner (hydrogen peroxide), ITW Permatex 133MA Anti-Seize Lubricant (petroleum distillates, hydrotreated heavy naphthenic; aluminum powder), Dowanol PM Glycol Ether (propylene glycol monomethyl ether and 2-methoxy-1-propanol), Univar Isopropyl Alcohol, J-B Weld Resin and Hardener, Wilsonart M-Melamine Adhesive, Novus Plastic Polish #1 (isopropyl alcohol), General Air Silvershield Welding Gas Mixture (carbon dioxide and argon), and Praxair Compressed Oxygen Gas.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 29 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    (a) Xylem Designs at 309 Hickory St, Fort Collins, CO: On and before March 17, 2017, the employer did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area.  Employees did not know the hazards of the chemicals in their work areas. This condition exposed employees to chemical hazards, including but not limited to isopropyl alcohol, acetone, Elastocast T76 (Diphenylmethane-4,4'-diisocyanate), General Finishes Dye Stains (chromium metal), and Magnamax Precatalyzed Lacquer (n-butyl acetate, ethanol, 2-propanol, 1-butanol, ethyl acetate).      Abatement Note: Information and training may be designed to cover categories of hazards (e.g., flammability, carcinogenicity) or specific chemicals. Chemical-specific information must always be available through labels and material safety data sheets.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.107 B05 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(i): There were no visible gauges, audible alarms or pressure activated devices installed in paint spray booths to indicate or ensure that the required air speed was maintained. The average air speed over the open face of the paint spray booth was less than 100 linear feet per minute.    (a) Xylem Designs at 309 Hickory St, Fort Collins, CO: On and before March 17, 2017, the employer did not ensure there was visible gauge(s), audible alarm(s) or pressure activated device(s) installed on a Brinks spray booth. The air flow was measured at 40 linear feet per minute. This condition exposed the employees to fire and explosion hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.107 H12

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.107(h)(12): All areas used for spraying, including the interior of the booth, were not protected by an automatic sprinklers or other approved automatic extinguishing equipment:  (a) Xylem Designs at 309 Hickory St, Fort Collins, CO: On and before March 17, 2017, the employer did not ensure the automatic sprinklers inside the Brinks spray booth were functioning, in that the sprinklers located on the ceiling were inoperable due to being covered with plastic.  This condition exposed spray booth and facility employees to fire hazards during spray painting operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  (a) Xylem Designs at 309 Hickory St, Fort Collins, CO: On and before March 17, 2017, the employer required five employees to use 3M elastomeric respirators with 6001 organic vapor and 6211 Paint Project cartridges during spray booth and rotocasting activities but did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program. This condition exposed employees to health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 24 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:    (a) Xylem Designs at 309 Hickory St, Fort Collins, CO: On and before March 17, 2017, the employer did not ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was provided with the information contained in Appendix D to this section when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible. The employer provided 3M elastomeric respirators with 6001 organic vapor and 6211 Paint Project cartridges to employees for voluntary use during work activities. This condition exposed the employees to a respiratory hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 C02 II

Other-than-serious 2 instances 29 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:  (a) Xylem Designs at 309 Hickory St, Fort Collins, CO: On and before March 17, 2017, the employer determined that voluntary use of 6211 Paint Project cartridges and 3M elastomeric respirators with 6001 organic vapor cartridges was permissible for twenty-four employees but did not conduct establish and implement a written respiratory protection program. This condition exposed employees to health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 D01 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:   (a) Xylem Designs at 309 Hickory St, Fort Collins, CO: On and before March 17, 2017, the employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazards in the workplace associated with employees spraying lacquer and stain dyes, containing n-butyl acetate and chromium metal, with employees conducting rotocasting with two-part urethane, containing diphenylmethane-4,4'-diisocyanate, and with employees working with wood, releasing wood dust. This condition potentially exposed employees to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 29 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  (a) Xylem Designs at 309 Hickory St, Fort Collins, CO: On and before March 17, 2017, the employer required five employees to use 3M elastomeric respirators with 6001 organic vapor and 6211 Paint Project cartridges during spray booth and rotocasting activities but did not conduct medical evaluations. This condition exposed employees to health hazards.  (b) Xylem Designs at 309 Hickory St, Fort Collins, CO: On and before March 17, 2017, the employer determined that voluntary use of 3M elastomeric respirators with 6001 organic vapor and 6211 Paint Project cartridges was permissible for twenty-four employees but did not conduct medical evaluations. This condition exposed employees to health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  (a) Xylem Designs at 309 Hickory St, Fort Collins, CO: On and before March 17, 2017, the employer required five employees to use 3M elastomeric tight-fitting respirators with 6001 organic vapor and 6211 Paint Project cartridges during spray booth and rotocasting activities but did not conduct fit testing prior to initial use of the respirator. This condition exposed employees to chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:  (a) Xylem Designs at 309 Hickory St, Fort Collins, CO: On and before March 17, 2017, the employer required employees to use 3M elastomeric tight-fitting respirators with 6001 organic vapor and 6211 Paint Project cartridges but did not ensure that three employees did not have facial hair that came between the sealed surface of the facepiece. This condition exposed employees to health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.157 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 29 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.157(b)(2): An emergency action plan meeting the requirements of 1910.38, which designated certain employees to be the only employees authorized to use the available portable fire extinguishers and which required all other employees in the fire area to immediately evacuate the affected work area upon the sounding of the fire alarm, was not developed and implemented.  (a) Xylem Designs at 309 Hickory St, Fort Collins, CO: On and before March 17, 2017, the employer did not designate and authorize certain employees to use the available portable fire extinguishers to fight incipient fires or the other employees in the fire area to immediately evacuate the affected work area upon the sounding of the fire alarm in a written emergency action plan, meeting the requirements of 1910.38. This condition exposed employees to fire hazards.   Abatement Note: An emergency action plan must include at a minimum: Procedures for reporting a fire or other emergency; Procedures for emergency evacuation, including type of evacuation and exit route assignments; Procedures to be followed by employees who remain to operate critical plant operations before they evacuate; Procedures to account for all employees after evacuation; The name or job title of every employee who may be contacted by employees who need more information about the plan or an explanation of their duties under the plan.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.157 G04

Other-than-serious 1 instance 24 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(4): Employees who have been designated to use fire fighting equipment as a part of the emergency action plan were not provided training in the use of appropriate equipment upon initial assignment and at least annually thereafter:  (a) Xylem Designs at 309 Hickory St, Fort Collins, CO: On and before March 17, 2017, the employer designated employees to use two water hoses located on rollers affixed to the ceiling beside the northern and southern entrances to fight incipient fires. The employer was not aware of electrical hazards at the establishment and did not provide training to ensure that employees were not exposed to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.213 C03

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.213(c)(3): Hand-fed ripsaw(s) did not have non kickback fingers or dogs so located as to oppose the thrust or tendency of the saw to pick up the material or to throw it back toward the operator:  (a) Xylem Designs at 309 Hickory St, Fort Collins, CO: On and before March 17, 2017, the employer did not ensure that three Sawstop table saws were installed with non kickback fingers or dogs so located as to oppose the thrust or tendency of the saw to pick up the material or to throw it back toward the operator. This condition exposed employees to struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.303 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled equipment shall be installed and used in accordance with any instructions included in the listing or labeling:  (a) Xylem Designs at 309 Hickory St, Fort Collins, CO: On and before March 17, 2017, the employer did not ensure that several metal electrical outlet boxes were used in accordance with listed instructions, in that the outlet boxes in use on the flexible cords included pre-punched knockouts that could be dislodged by frequent handling. This condition exposed employees to electrical hazards while connecting and disconnecting electric-powered equipment at the outlet box at the end of a flexible cord.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.305 B02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 29 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Pull boxes, junction boxes, and fittings were not provided with covers approved for the purpose:   (a) Xylem Designs at 309 Hickory St, Fort Collins, CO: On and before March 17, 2017, the employer did not ensure that employees were not exposed to electrical shock hazards in that a 120 volt electrical box in the southwest corner of the building was not covered. This conditions exposed employees to arc flash, shock, and electrocution hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342181641.