Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: SUN SERVICE AND BODY OF CHITTENANGO INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of SUN SERVICE AND BODY OF CHITTENANGO INC. in 611 LAKEPORT RD, CHITTENANGO, NY 13037 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 342195120.

Watch SUN Service AND Body OF Chittenango INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for SUN Service AND Body OF Chittenango INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
611 LAKEPORT RD
City
CHITTENANGO
State
NY
ZIP
13037
Mailing
PO BOX 266, CHITTENANGO, NY 13037
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811121
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1630.00 · Current $1223.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)  Employer did not establish nor implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite specific procedures when respirators were necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators were required by the employer:   a)  Body Shop, on or about 3/22/17: Employer had not established a written respirator protection program when employees were required to wear half mask air purifying respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1222.5
  • — Z (S) $1630

1910.134 C02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:  a) Body Shop, on or about 3/22/17: Employer allowed voluntary use of dust masks and had not supplied employees with Appendix D of the respirator standard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   Note:  The employer may discontinue an employees medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.     a) Body Shop, on or about 3/22/17: Employees required to wear half face air purifying respirators have not been provided with a medical evaluation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2):  Employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight fitting face piece respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator face piece (size, style, model or make) was used, and at least annually thereafter:    a)  Body Shop, on or about 3/22/17: Employees required to wear half face air purifying respirators and had not been fit tested.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(k)  The employer did not provide effective, comprehensive, understandable, and annual (or more often if necessary) training to employees who are required to use respirators:    a) Body Shop, on or about 3/22/17: Employees required to wear half face air purifying respirators and have not received respirator training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1630.00 · Current $1223.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    1) Labeling and other forms of warning;   2) MSDS requirements for the hazardous materials known to be present at the jobsite;   3) Employee training and information.  The written program must also include:   (a) A list of all the chemicals used at the jobsite.   (b) Methods to inform employees of hazards associated with non-routine tasks.   (c) Methods the employer will use to inform any contractors employees of workplace hazards.    a) Throughout the facility, on our about 3/22/17: A written hazard communication program was not developed for the employees who work with hazardous materials including but not limited to: PPG Envirobase Paint; Safety Kleen Ultra Kleen Spray Solution; Safety Kleen Lacquer Thinner; Echo Wheel Cleaner & Brightener and Platinum Professional Car Wash Systems.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1222.5
  • — Z (S) $1630

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) and (2) on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced into their work area:  a) Throughout the facility, on or about 3/22/17: Employees were exposed to hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to:  PPPG Envirobase Paint; Safety Kleen Ultra Kleen Spray Solution; Safety Kleen Lacquer Thinner; Echo Wheel Cleaner & Brightener and Platinum Professional Car Wash Systems and were not provided information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) and (2).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342195120.