2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

OSHA Inspection: PORTA WELD, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of PORTA WELD, INC. in 1009 WEST JUNEAU AVENUE, MILWAUKEE, WI 53233 (NAICS 238120). OSHA activity number 342214889.

Watch Porta Weld, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Porta Weld, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
PORTA WELD, INC.
Site address
1009 WEST JUNEAU AVENUE
City
MILWAUKEE
State
WI
ZIP
53233
Mailing
18267 CASEY RD., GRAYSLAKE, IL 60030
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238120
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.251 A02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3259.00 · Current $1300.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.251(a)(2)(i): Employers did not ensure that rigging equipment had permanently affixed and legible identification markings as prescribed by the manufacturer that indicate the recommended safe working load:    (a) The employer did not ensure that rigging equipment was labeled and marked with the safe working load.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1300
  • — Z (S) $3259

1926.451 A06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2716.00 · Current $1700.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6): Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person:    (a) In Building B3, a scaffold system, secured by ratchet straps, was used to gain access to a higher level of the erected steel. The scaffold system was not designed by a qualified person, exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1700
  • — Z (S) $2716

1926.451 F15

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3803.00 · Current $2400.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(15): Ladders were used on scaffolds to increase the working level height of employees: without satisfying the criteria of subparagraphs (i) - (iv) of this paragraph.Note:  This paragraph does not apply to large area scaffolds where the employer has satisfied the following criteria: the ladder was placed against a structure which was not a part of the scaffold and the scaffold was secured against the sideways thrust e    (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were not using a ladder from the platform of a scissor lift. Employees were using a ladder that was resting on the elevated platform of a scissor lift to access a higher area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2400
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2173.00 · Current $1800.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    (a) The employer did not ensure that an unguarded edge leading to an extension ladder on the fourth floor of building A1 had a guardrail system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1800
  • — Z (S) $2173

1926.502 B02 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.502(b)(2)(i): Midrails, when used, were not installed at a height midway between the top edge of the guardrail system and the walking/working level:  (a)  Near the main door on the inside of the vestibule area, the employer did not ensure that a mid rail was between the top rail and walking/working surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 B03

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.502(b)(3): Guardrail systems were not capable of withstanding, without failure, a force of at least 200 pounds (890 N) applied within 2 inches (5.1 cm) of the top edge, in any outward or downward direction, at any point along the top edge:  (a) Outside the main door vestibule area, near the steel erection staging area, the employer did not ensure that a guardrail system that covered an opening in the wall was secured so as to ensure a force of at least 200 pounds applied to any outward direction would not move the guardrail.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 B09

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.502(b)(9): 1926.502(b)(9): Top rails, consisting of wire rope, were not flagged at not more than 6-foot intervals with high-visibility material.  (a) In the first floor corridor area in B-1, wire rope, used as a top rail was not flagged at 6 foot intervals.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:    (a) In building B3, the employer did not ensure that employees were using fall protection when working on a platform that was suspended between erected metal beams.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2716.00 · Current $1600.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    (a) In building B3, the employer did not ensure that extension ladders used for access was at least 3' above the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1600
  • — Z (S) $2716

1926.755 A03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.755(a)(3): Columns were not set on level finished floors, pre-grouted leveling plates, leveling nuts, or shim packs which are adequate to transfer the construction loads.  (a) In building B3, the employer did not ensure that columns were installed on adequate, pre-grouted leveling plates designed to support a different dimension of base plates.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342214889.