Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: MDC EXCAVATION, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MDC EXCAVATION, INC. in 149 CHESTNUT STREET, SEEKONK, MA 02771 (NAICS 237110). OSHA activity number 342239720.

Watch MDC Excavation, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for MDC Excavation, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
149 CHESTNUT STREET
City
SEEKONK
State
MA
ZIP
02771
Mailing
149 CHESTNUT STREET, SEEKONK, MA 02771
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
237110
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1630.00 · Current $500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    Establishment:    Employer had not developed and implemented a written Hazard Communication Program for employees who were exposed to hazardous chemicals such as abrasive blasting agents (Maxi-Blast 30-60 Eurogrit and Silica Sand), Blaster Parts Washer solvent, and acetone that included labeling requirements, safety data sheets, and employee training.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $500
  • — C (S) $1630
  • — Z (S) $1630

1910.134 C02 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1630.00 · Current $815.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:    Yard:      Employer had not developed and implemented a respiratory protection program for employees who use respirators such as Bullard supplied air respirator for protection against airborne contaminants such as silica during abrasive blasting operations and elastomeric half mask respirator for protection against solvents. Elements required by this section included, but were not limited to, procedures for selecting respirators for use in the workplace, procedures for proper use of respirators, and training of employees in the respiratory hazards to which they are potentially exposed.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $815
  • — C (S) $1630
  • — Z (S) $1630

1910.134 D01 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(ii): The employer did not select and use a NIOSH-certified respirator in compliance with the conditions of its certification:  Establishment:  Employer provided a Bullard GR50 supplied air respirator for employee protection against respiratory hazards such as silica during manual abrasive blasting operations which was not approved for abrasive blasting.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342239720.