OSHA Inspection: JAG I, LLC

Issued

2017-07-18 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-05-10 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2897.00 · Current $2029.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:    a) Worksite - On or about April 14, 2017, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards to the eyes due to the employees using and working around nail guns and other power tools while on the roof without wearing safety glasses.    b) Worksite - On or about April 14, 2017, employees for the roofing contractor were exposed to struck-by hazards to the eyes due to the employees using and working around nail guns while on the roof without wearing safety glasses.

Issued

2017-07-18 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-05-10 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $5070.00 · Current $3549.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i): Each employee on a boatswains' chair, catenary scaffold, float scaffold, needle beam scaffold, or ladder jack scaffold was not protected by a personal fall arrest system:    a) Worksite - On or about April 14, 2017, an employee for the roofing contractor that was working on a ladder jack scaffold was not protected from fall hazards of approximately 13 feet by a personal fall arrest system.

Issued

2017-07-18 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-05-10 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $5070.00 · Current $3549.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section:    a) Worksite - On or about April 14, 2017, an employee was not adequately protected from falls by the use of a guardrail system accompanied with the adequate personal fall arrest system working on a platform lifted up by a JLG Lull (944E-42) approximately 14 feet in height above the ground.     b) Worksite - On or about April 14, 2017, an employee was not adequately protected from falls by the use of a guardrail system accompanied with the adequate personal fall arrest system working on a platform lifted up by a JLG/GRADALL (G9-43A) Lull approximately 14 feet in height above the ground.

Issued

2017-07-18 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-05-10 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3622.00 · Current $2535.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.452(k)(5): Scaffold platforms were bridged on to another:    a) Worksite - On or about April 14, 2017, an employee for the roofing contractor was exposed to fall hazards of approximately 13 feet due to working on a ladder jack scaffold that had platforms bridged together.

Issued

2017-07-18 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-05-10 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3622.00 · Current $2535.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt with lanyard attached to the boom or basket was not worn by employee(s) working from an aerial lift:    a) Worksite - On or about April 14, 2017, employees were exposed to fall hazards when working in an ADMAR SKYJACK (SJ66T, 82515) aerial lift without wearing a body belt and/or lanyard attached to the boom or basket approximately 14 feet in height from the ground.

Issued

2017-07-18 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-05-10 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $5070.00 · Current $3549.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system.  Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system:    a) Worksite - On or about April 14, 2017, employees were exposed to fall hazards when working on a 6 on 12 pitched roof approximately 14 feet in height from ground to eave of roof without fall protection.    b) Worksite - On or about April 14, 2017, employees of the roofing contractor were exposed to fall hazards when working on a 6 on 12 pitched roof approximately 14 feet in height from ground to eave of roof without fall protection.

Issued

2017-07-18 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-05-10 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3622.00 · Current $2535.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.503(c)(3): The employer did not retrain affected employees who demonstrated inadequate understanding, knowledge, and skill in the use of fall protection systems or equipment:    a) Worksite - On or about April 14, 2017, employees were exposed to fall hazards when working on a 6 on 12 pitched roof approximately 14 feet in height from ground to eave of roof without fall protection.  The employees did not understand the requirements for fall protection or demonstrate the knowledge as to when these fall protection systems need to be used.    b) Worksite - On or about April 14, 2017, an employee was not adequately protected from falls by the use of a guardrail system accompanied with the adequate personal fall arrest system working on a platform lifted up by a JLG Lull (944E-42) approximately 14 feet in height above the ground.  The employee did not understand the requirements for fall protection or demonstrate the knowledge as to when these fall protection systems need to be used.     c) Worksite - On or about April 14, 2017, an employee was not adequately protected from falls by the use of a guardrail system accompanied with the adequate personal fall arrest system working on a platform lifted up by a JLG/GRADALL (G9-43A) Lull approximately 14 feet in height above the ground.  The employee did not understand the requirements for fall protection or demonstrate the knowledge as to when these fall protection systems need to be used.    d) Worksite - On or about April 14, 2017, employees were exposed to fall hazards when working in a ADMAR SKYJACK (SJ66T, 82515) aerial lift without wearing a body belt and/or lanyard attached to the boom or basket approximately 14 feet in height from the ground.  The employees did not understand the requirements for fall protection or demonstrate the knowledge as to when these fall protection systems need to be used.

Issued

2017-07-18 00:00:00

Abate by

2019-05-10 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $5070.00 · Current $3549.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    a) Worksite - On or about April 14, 2017, an employee for the roofing contractor was exposed to fall hazards of approximately 13 feet when accessing a ladder jack scaffold platform using an aluminum extension ladder that extended approximately 1 foot above the landing surface of the ladder jack scaffold.    b) Worksite - On or about April 14, 2017, an employee was exposed to fall hazards of approximately 14 feet when accessing a roof using an aluminum extension ladder that extended approximately 6 inches above the landing surface of the roof.    c) Worksite - On or about April 14, 2017, an employee for the roofing contractor was exposed to fall hazards of approximately 14 feet when accessing a roof using an aluminum extension ladder that extended approximately 2 feet above the landing surface of the roof.    d) Worksite - On or about April 14, 2017, an employee for the roofing contractor was exposed to fall hazards of approximately 14 feet when accessing a roof using an aluminum extension ladder that extended approximately 2 feet above the landing surface of the roof.