Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: WINDY CITY CATASTROPHE SOLUTIONS, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of WINDY CITY CATASTROPHE SOLUTIONS, INC. in 380 JOHN ANDERSON DRIVE, ORMOND BEACH, FL 32176 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342269479.

Watch Windy City Catastrophe Solutions, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Windy City Catastrophe Solutions, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
380 JOHN ANDERSON DRIVE
City
ORMOND BEACH
State
FL
ZIP
32176
Mailing
260 WEST 323RD STREET, BEECHER, IL 60401
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $305.00 · Current $305.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  a. On or about June 23, 2017, the employer failed to provide abatement certification for this citation within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, exposing employees to physical hazards.  Windy City Catastrophe Solutions, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard 29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1226947, citation 2, item number 001 and was affirmed as a final order on May 24, 2017, with respect to a workplace located at 380 John Anderson Drive, Ormond Beach, FL 32176.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $305

1926.501 B04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2173.00 · Current $1630.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(4)(i): Each employee on walking/working surfaces was not protected from falling through holes (including skylights), more than six feet (1.8 m) above lower levels, by personal fall arrest systems, covers, or guardrail systems erected around such holes:  a. On or about January 25, 2017, roof area, back side of roof, employees working near two skylights were not protected from falling 12 feet through the (2' x 4') skylights to the floor below by a personal fall arrest system, covers or a guardrail system around each skylight.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1629.8
  • — Z (S) $2173

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3803.00 · Current $1630.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b):  a. On or about January 25, 2017, roof area, employees installing roof shingles on a 12:12 pitch roof were not protected from falling up to a 24 feet fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1629.8
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2173.00 · Current $1630.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  a. On or a about January 25, 2017, left side of home, a Werner 32-foot extension ladder had not been extended 3 feet past the landing, exposing employees to fall hazards.   b. On or about January 25, 2017, back side of home, a Werner 24-foot extension ladder had not been extended 3 feet past the landing, exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1629.8
  • — Z (S) $2173

1926.20 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain a safety program which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):  a. On or about January 25, 2017, the employer did not initiate and maintain a written safety program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342269479.