Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: PREFERRED HARDWOODS, LLC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of PREFERRED HARDWOODS, LLC in 2189 HIGHWAY 175, RICHFIELD, WI 53076 (NAICS 444190). OSHA activity number 342290020.

Watch Preferred Hardwoods, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Preferred Hardwoods, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2189 HIGHWAY 175
City
RICHFIELD
State
WI
ZIP
53076
Mailing
2189 HIGHWAY 175, RICHFIELD, WI 53076
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
444190
Employees
12
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 10 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3622.00 · Current $1800.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative.    (a) The employer had not established a Lockout/Tagout program for the control of hazardous energy for machines such as but not limited to Weing Powermax 1000/1200 moulders.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1800
  • — Z (S) $3622

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 10 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees.  (a) The employer had not provided training on the energy control (lockout/tag out) program to ensure that all required elements of the program were understood by all authorized employees whose work operations were, or may be in an area where energy control procedures are utilized.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2173.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met.    (a) The employer had not developed and implemented a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2173

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 11 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work  shift to employees when they were in their work area(s).  (a) The employer did not have a safety data sheets for hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to LPS-1.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 11 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area.  (a) Employees were not provided with information and training from the employer regarding the use of hazardous chemicals that include but not limited to LPS-1.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Other-than-serious 3 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l).  (a) The employer had not trained or evaluated each operator who is authorized to operate the Hyster 60 (power industrial trucks) to ensure they were competent to operate the forklifts safely.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 L02 II

Other-than-serious 3 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace.  (a) Power industrial truck operators were not provided with practical training and were not evaluated on their performance on operating the Hyster 60 sit down type power industrial trucks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 Q07

Other-than-serious 3 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service.  (a) Three Hyster 60 PIV's were being used on a daily basis without being inspected before use by operators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342290020.