Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: CARLOS VEGA-PORTILLO

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CARLOS VEGA-PORTILLO in 385-391 PARK AVE, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06604 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 342298072.

Watch Carlos Vega-Portillo — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Carlos Vega-Portillo is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
385-391 PARK AVE
City
BRIDGEPORT
State
CT
ZIP
06604
Mailing
374 CHAMBERLAN AVE., BRIDGEPORT, CT 06606
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236118
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2716.00 · Current $1540.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain a safety program which provides for frequent and regular inspections of jobsites, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person.    Jobsite: The employer did not conduct frequent and regular inspections of the job site to ensure compliance with fall protection safety, safety glass use and hard hat use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1540
  • — Z (S) $2716

1926.20 F01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2716.00 · Current $1540.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(f)(1):  The employer did not provide personal protective equipment to each employee required to use the personal protective equipment.    Jobsite:  The employer did not provide Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) to the employees that were exposed to fall and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1540
  • — Z (S) $2716

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2173.00 · Current $1240.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:    Jobsite:  The employee who was working below the roofing job was not protected from head injuries by the use of protective helmets.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1240
  • — Z (S) $2173

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2716.00 · Current $1540.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles.    Jobsite: The employees who were installing asphalt roofing shingles with pneumatic nail guns were not wearing eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1540
  • — Z (S) $2716

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3803.00 · Current $2360.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):     Jobsite:  The employees who were re-roofing the 8 in 12 pitch roof were not protected from fall hazards by the use guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2360
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2173.00 · Current $1240.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    Jobsite: The employees who were exposed fall hazards while working on the roof were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1240
  • — Z (S) $2173

1926.503 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer.  Jobsite:  The employer did not prepare a written certification record for fall protection training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2716.00 · Current $1540.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    Jobsite:  The side rails of the extension ladder that was used to gain access to the roof at a height of approximately 19 feet 10 inches above the ground did not extend at least 3 feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1540
  • — Z (S) $2716

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342298072.