Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: JOSE ANTONIO LEMUS BEDOLLA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOSE ANTONIO LEMUS BEDOLLA in 311 ARCHWAY LANE (LOT #3), PEACHTREE CITY, GA 30269 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 342313889.

Watch Jose Antonio Lemus Bedolla — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jose Antonio Lemus Bedolla is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
311 ARCHWAY LANE (LOT #3)
City
PEACHTREE CITY
State
GA
ZIP
30269
Mailing
8831 60TH STREET, NE #A, MARYSVILLE, WA 98270
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2173.00 · Current $2173.00
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  (a) New residential construction on Lot #3, Front porch roof: On or about May 9, 2017, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards while operating a pneumatic nail gun at 120 PSI, in that protective eyewear was not provided while engaged in framing activities.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2173

1926.403 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1630.00 · Current $1630.00
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(1): Employer did not ensure that electrical equipment is free from recognized hazards that are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees:  (a) New residential construction on Lot #3, Front side at work bench: On or about May 9, 2017, and at times prior, the employer failed to inspect the electrical cords prior to the start of the shift, in that cords used had damaged protective casing and a damage strain relief exposing the internal copper circuits as employees used this cord to power the circular saw used to cut rafters.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1630

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3803.00 · Current $3803.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:   (a) New residential construction located on Lot #3, Top plate of front porch: On or about May 9, 2017, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of 11-feet, 6-inches to the lower level, in that a fall protection system was not provided to the employees installing roof rafters.   (b) New residential construction located on Lot #3, Roof: On or about May 9, 2017, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to falls of over 20-feet from a 10/12 pitched roof, in that a fall protection system was not provided to employees engaged in framing work.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.1052 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2173.00 · Current $2173.00
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with at least one handrail and one stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge:  (a) New residential construction located on Lot #3, First floor stairway: On or about May 9, 2017, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of up to 4-feet to the lower concrete surface, in that stair rails were not installed along the open sides of the stairway used by employees to access the upper levels.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2173

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342313889.