CORTLAND, NY —
OSHA Inspection: ENTERPRISE SERVICE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ENTERPRISE SERVICE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. in 823 NYS RT 13, CORTLAND, NY 13045 (NAICS 624310). OSHA activity number 342324423.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ENTERPRISE SERVICE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Site address
- 823 NYS RT 13
- City
- CORTLAND
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 13045
- Mailing
- 823 NYS RT 13, CORTLAND, NY 13045
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 624310
- Employees
- 28
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $9054.00 · Current $6791.00 Reduced
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): A continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (n) was not instituted when employee noise exposures equaled or exceeded an 8 hour time-weighted average sound level (TWA) of 85 dBA: a) Grinding Area, on or about 05/17/17: An employee working as a Grinder Operator was exposed to continuous noise at a level of 106.6% of the dose of the OSHA permissible exposure limit. The equivalent dBA for the 106.6% dose is approximately 90.5 dBA calculated as the 8 hour time weighted sound pressure level. The sampling was conducted on 5/17/17 for 397 minutes. Exposure calculations include a zero increment for the 83 minutes not sampled. Employee was wearing ear plugs. b) Grinding Area, on or about 05/17/17: An employee working as a Grinder Operator was exposed to continuous noise at a level of 92.6% of the dose of the OSHA permissible exposure limit. The equivalent dBA for the 92.6% dose is approximately 89.4 dBA calculated as the 8 hour time weighted sound pressure level. The sampling was conducted on 5/17/17 for 440 minutes. Exposure calculations include a zero increment for the 40 minutes not sampled. Employee was wearing ear plugs. c) Grinding Area, on or about 05/17/17: An employee working as a Flange Operator was exposed to continuous noise at a level of 106.4% of the dose of the OSHA permissible exposure limit. The equivalent dBA for the 106.4% dose is approximately 90.5 dBA calculated as the 8 hour time weighted sound pressure level. The sampling was conducted on 5/17/17 for 410 minutes. Exposure calculations include a zero increment for the 70 minutes not sampled. Employee was wearing ear muffs. d) Grinding Area, on or about 05/17/17: An employee working as a Flange Operator was exposed to continuous noise at a level of 90.4% of the dose of the OSHA permissible exposure limit. The equivalent dBA for the 90.4% dose is approximately 89.3 dBA calculated as the 8 hour time weighted sound pressure level. The sampling was conducted on 5/17/17 for 367 minutes. Exposure calculations include a zero increment for the 113 minutes not sampled. Employee was wearing ear muffs.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6790.5
- — Z (S) $9054
1910.95 L01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(l)(1): A copy of 29 CFR 1910.95 was not made available to affected employees or their representatives nor was a copy posted in the workplace: Please enter your variable information after this comment box. a) Grinding Area, on or about 5/17/17: The employer did not provide a copy of 1910.95 to the affected employees, or post a copy in the workplace, when employees were exposed to noise that exceeded the 8-hour time weighted average.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $9054.00 · Current $6791.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by flying parts: a) Grinding Area, on or about 5/11/17: Spools were not locked onto the spool rack spindles to keep them from flying off.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6790.5
- — Z (S) $9054
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 624310)
SARASOTA, FL—2026-07-07
SEVITA NEURORESTORATIVE COCONUT RANCH
SAN LEANDRO, CA—2026-06-24
EAST BAY INNOVATIONS
MANITOWOC, WI—2026-06-24
ASCEND SERVICES, INC.
OAKLAND, CA—2026-06-15
CIVICORPS
GENEVA, NY—2026-05-22
NYSOPWDD DAY HABILITATION CENTER
More inspections in NY
MAYVILLE, NY—2026-07-16
MAYVILLE VILLAGE DPW
NEW HYDE PARK, NY—2026-07-16
NORTH HEMPSTEAD TN MICHAEL J TULLY PARK
CONESUS, NY—2026-07-16
CONESUS TN HIGHWAY DEPT
COMSTOCK, NY—2026-07-15
NYSDOCCS WASHINGTON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
BALDWINSVILLE, NY—2026-07-15
LYSANDER TOWN HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342324423.