Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: PROCRAFT EXTERIORS, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PROCRAFT EXTERIORS, INC. in 6157 KEEBLER OAKS RD, MARYVILLE, IL 62062 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342333333.

Watch Procraft Exteriors, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Procraft Exteriors, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6157 KEEBLER OAKS RD
City
MARYVILLE
State
IL
ZIP
62062
Mailing
11939 MANCHESTER RD STE 144, SAINT LOUIS, MO 63131
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.152 D04

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3621.00 · Current $2354.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.152(d)(4): At least one portable fire extinguisher having a rating of not less than 20B:C units was not provided on all vehicles used for transporting and/or dispensing flammable or combustible liquids:    The employer did not ensure that a portable fire extinguisher was available to employees who were carrying multiple gasoline cans in a white Ford work van. The gasoline was being used to fill the air compressor.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2353.65
  • — Z (S) $3621

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5071.00 · Current $3296.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employees engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employees provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of subsection 1926.502:    The employer did not ensure that fall protection was implemented during residential construction operations when workers were exposed to fall hazards of 8 feet or greater while performing roofing activities.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3296.15
  • — Z (S) $5071

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342333333.