Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JOSE MANUEL GARCIA MARTINEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOSE MANUEL GARCIA MARTINEZ in 1100 LA CANTERA AVE, MCALLEN, TX 78503 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 342403623.

Watch Jose Manuel Garcia Martinez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jose Manuel Garcia Martinez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1100 LA CANTERA AVE
City
MCALLEN
State
TX
ZIP
78503
Mailing
5904 AVENUE A, MISSION, TX 78574
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.405 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2716.00 · Current $2716.00
29 CFR 1926.405(b)(2): All pull boxes, junction boxes, and fittings were not provided with covers:  At this worksite, employees used an electrical box with no cover exposing live electrical wiring.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2716

1926.405 G02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:  At this worksite, an electrical box from which employees connected their hand held electrical tools demonstrated a strain relief exposing the wires of the cord.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2716.00 · Current $2716.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   At this site, two employees worked on the frame of a roof at heights greater than 6 feet with no fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2716

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342403623.