Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: DAVID MORALES

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of DAVID MORALES in 1501 N ZARAGOZA, EL PASO, TX 79938 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 342408812.

Watch David Morales — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for David Morales is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
DAVID MORALES
Site address
1501 N ZARAGOZA
City
EL PASO
State
TX
ZIP
79938
Mailing
333 ESTANCIA LINDA, SAN ELIZARIO, TX 79849
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238310
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3259.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports:    On or about June 14, 2017, employer did not ensure that a scaffold was fully planked. This condition exposed employees to fall hazards exceeding 10 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $3259

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3259.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:    On or about June 14, 2017, the employer did not ensure that the scaffold was inspected by a competent person, exposing employees to a fall hazards exceeding 10 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $3259

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3259.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems:    On or about June 14, 2017, employer did not ensure that the middle and top guard rails were installed on the scaffold. This condition exposed employee to fall and struck-by hazards exceeding 10 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $3259

1926.451 H02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3259.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2)(ii): A toeboard was not erected along the edge of platforms more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower levels for a distance sufficient to protect employees below.    On or about June 14, 2017, employer did not ensure that toe board were installed along the edge of the platform. This condition exposed employee to overhead stuck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $3259

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3259.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.    On or about June 14, 2017, the employer did not ensure that employee plastering a commercial property wall was  trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize fall hazards. This condition exposed   employees to a fall hazards exceeding 10 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $3259

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3259.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.    On or about June 14, 2017, employer did not ensure that employee working on the edge of a roof was provided with and required to use adequate fall protection. Employees was exposed to fall hazards from and elevation exceeding 6 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $3259

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342408812.