EL PASO, TX —
OSHA Inspection: DAVID MORALES
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of DAVID MORALES in 1501 N ZARAGOZA, EL PASO, TX 79938 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 342408812.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DAVID MORALES
- Site address
- 1501 N ZARAGOZA
- City
- EL PASO
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 79938
- Mailing
- 333 ESTANCIA LINDA, SAN ELIZARIO, TX 79849
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238310
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3259.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports: On or about June 14, 2017, employer did not ensure that a scaffold was fully planked. This condition exposed employees to fall hazards exceeding 10 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $3259
1926.451 F03
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3259.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity: On or about June 14, 2017, the employer did not ensure that the scaffold was inspected by a competent person, exposing employees to a fall hazards exceeding 10 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $3259
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3259.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems: On or about June 14, 2017, employer did not ensure that the middle and top guard rails were installed on the scaffold. This condition exposed employee to fall and struck-by hazards exceeding 10 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $3259
1926.451 H02 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3259.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2)(ii): A toeboard was not erected along the edge of platforms more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower levels for a distance sufficient to protect employees below. On or about June 14, 2017, employer did not ensure that toe board were installed along the edge of the platform. This condition exposed employee to overhead stuck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $3259
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3259.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. On or about June 14, 2017, the employer did not ensure that employee plastering a commercial property wall was trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize fall hazards. This condition exposed employees to a fall hazards exceeding 10 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $3259
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3259.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. On or about June 14, 2017, employer did not ensure that employee working on the edge of a roof was provided with and required to use adequate fall protection. Employees was exposed to fall hazards from and elevation exceeding 6 feet.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $3259
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238310)
ELLETTSVILLE, IN—2026-07-13
ENVIRO HEAT, LLC
ELLETTSVILLE, IN—2026-07-13
RWS INSULATION SERVICES, LLC
IRVINE, CA—2026-07-10
COAST BUILDING PRODUCTS
FRANCESTOWN, NH—2026-07-10
D&D INSULATION, LLC
DOWNINGTOWN, PA—2026-07-09
CAPITAL INTERIOR, LLC
More inspections in TX
SPRING, TX—2026-07-10
DORSTENER WIRE TECH INC.
FORT WORTH, TX—2026-07-10
RC PROFESSIONAL ROOFING OF TEXAS LLC
CYPRESS, TX—2026-07-10
FEDERICO CARVAJAL GARCIA
SAN ANTONIO, TX—2026-07-10
ED LONG'S METAL WORKS
SAN ANTONIO, TX—2026-07-09
WAREHOUSE RACK COMPANY, LP
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342408812.