MIAMI, FL —
OSHA Inspection: PIEDRAHITA GROUP LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PIEDRAHITA GROUP LLC in 261 PALM AVENUE, MIAMI, FL 33139 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 342505583.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PIEDRAHITA GROUP LLC
- Site address
- 261 PALM AVENUE
- City
- MIAMI
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33139
- Mailing
- 10900 SW 104 STREET UNIT 104, MIAMI, FL 33176
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238320
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
13 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $1630.00 · Current $815.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: On or about 7/28/2017, at the above addressed work site, employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard while applying stucco on a two-story residential home from a three-tier scaffold.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $815
- — Z (S) $1630
1926.451 H02 I
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2)(i): The area below the scaffold was not barricaded, and employees were not prohibited from entering the hazard area: On or about 7/28/2017, at the above addressed work site, employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard while applying stucco on a two-story residential home from a three-tier scaffold that was not barricaded.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2716.00 · Current $1358.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii): On or about 7/28/2017, at the above addressed work site, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while applying stucco on a two-story residential home from a three-tier scaffold that did not have sufficient planking.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1358
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.451 F03
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2716.00 · Current $1358.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity: On or about 7/28/2017, at the above addressed work site, the employer did not ensure scaffold and scaffold components were inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift during the application of stucco on a two-story residential building. PLEASE NOTE: CERTIFICATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1358
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2716.00 · Current $1358.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation: On or about 7/28/2017, at the above addressed work site, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while applying stucco on a two-story residential home from a three-tier scaffold that did not bear on base plates and mud sills.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1358
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.451 C02 III
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(iii): Unstable objects were used as working platforms: On or about 7/28/2017, at the above addressed work site, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while applying stucco on a two-story residential home from a three-tier scaffold where scaffold legs were installed on top of cement block units.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2716.00 · Current $1358.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Cross braces were used as a means of access.: On or about 7/28/2017, at the above addressed work site, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while applying stucco on a two-story residential home from a three-tier scaffold where cross braces were used to access the top level of the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1358
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2716.00 · Current $1358.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section: On or about 7/28/2017, at the above addressed work site, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while applying stucco on a two-story residential home from a three-tier scaffold that lacked guardrails.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1358
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.451 G04 I
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms: On or about 7/28/2017, at the above addressed work site, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while applying stucco on a two-story residential home from a three-tier scaffold that lacked guardrails along the open sides and ends of platforms.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.452 C02
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(2): Tubular welded frames and panels were not braced by cross, horizontal, or diagonal braces, or combination thereof, which would have secured vertical members together laterally: On or about 7/28/2017, at the above addressed work site, employees were exposed to a fall hazard while applying stucco on a two-story residential home from a three-tier scaffold that lacked diagonal braces.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee use appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors or potentially injurious light radiation: On or about 7/27/2017, at the above addressed work site, an employee mixing and applying stucco cement was exposed to severe eye irritation and chemical burns due to lack of eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: On or about 7/27/2017, at the above addressed work site, the employer did not develop a written hazard communication program, which employees were exposed to Portland Cement during the mixing and application of the stucco. PLEASE NOTE: CERTIFICATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not ensure that material safety data sheets were readily accessible to the employees in their work area during each work shift: On or about 7/27/2017, at the above addressed work site, the employer did not have the safety data sheet readily available at the work site for the stucco cement the employees were applying to the structure. PLEASE NOTE: CERTIFICATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238320)
FREEHOLD, NJ—2026-07-10
SPECTRA PAINTING, INC
WILLIAMSPORT, PA—2026-07-10
INTERNATIONAL PAINT PROS
RIVIERA BEACH, FL—2026-07-09
PINMAR USA INC.
REDDING, CA—2026-07-08
NICK MAYS PAINTING INC
MILWAUKEE, WI—2026-07-08
CALICHAPIN PAINTING AND LITTLE MORE, LLC
More inspections in FL
MARIANNA, FL—2026-07-13
PRIMETIME MOBILE MASONRY LLC
MELBOURNE, FL—2026-07-13
OMNIPOTENT BRANDS, LLC
QUINCY, FL—2026-07-13
WALMART
INDIAN ROCKS BEACH, FL—2026-07-10
UNKNOWN CONTRACTOR
CLEARWATER, FL—2026-07-10
ROOFTECH ROOFING & WATERPROOFING INC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342505583.