Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: DAVID CERANTES

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DAVID CERANTES in 2599 JUPITER DR. LOT 29, POWDER SPRINGS, GA 30127 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 342556438.

Watch David Cerantes — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for David Cerantes is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
DAVID CERANTES
Site address
2599 JUPITER DR. LOT 29
City
POWDER SPRINGS
State
GA
ZIP
30127
Mailing
1242 WISTERIA DR. SW, MABLETON, GA 30126
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2173.00 · Current $1304.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury:  a) Front of the house: On or about August 16, 2017, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to eye injuries, in that no eye protection was being worn while using pneumatic nail guns.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1303.8
  • — Z (S) $2173

1926.451 B04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3803.00 · Current $2282.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(4): Each end of a platform, not cleated or otherwise restrained by hooks or equivalent means, did not extend over the centerline of its support at least 6 inches (15 cm).  a) Front of the house: On or about August 16, 2017, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to lower level falls of approximately 16-feet, and struck by hazards eye injuries, in that the work platform did not extend at least 6 inches over the supports, and was not cleated or restrained while employees worked around and from a pump jack scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2281.8
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3803.00 · Current $2282.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames,  or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:  a) Front of the house: On or about August 16, 2017, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to lower level falls of approximately 16-feet, and struck-by hazards, in that the scaffold poles were placed directly onto soil with no mud sills installed while employees worked around and from a pump jack scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2281.8
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.452 J02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary.  a) Front of the house: On or about August 16, 2017, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees  to lower level falls of approximately 16-feet, and struck-by hazards while working from and around a pump jack scaffold, in that; the scaffold poles were not secured at the bottom or intermediate areas.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3803.00 · Current $2282.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.  a) Front of the house: On or about August 16, 2017, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to lower level falls of approximately 16-feet while working from a pump jack scaffold, in that a personal fall arrest system or complete guardrail system were not in place.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2281.8
  • — Z (S) $3803

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342556438.