Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: ROBERT D BAKER

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ROBERT D BAKER in 82 MAIN ST, CAMDEN, NY 13316 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342589264.

Watch Robert D Baker — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Robert D Baker is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ROBERT D BAKER
Site address
82 MAIN ST
City
CAMDEN
State
NY
ZIP
13316
Mailing
11724 FLORENCE HILL RD, CAMDEN, NY 13316
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
1
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2716.00 · Current $2716.00
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(5)(i): The end of a platform 10 feet or less in length extended over its support more than 12 inches and the platform was not designed and installed so that the cantilevered portion of the platform is able to support employees and/or materials without tipping, or has guardrails which block employee access to the cantilevered end    a) 82 Main St, Camden, NY, On or about 8/25/17: The employer assembled a scaffold platform that had its cantilevered planking extended greater than 12 inches past it main support.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2716

1926.451 C01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(1)(ii): Guys, ties, and/or braces were not installed  according to the scaffold manufacturer's recommendations or at the closest horizontal member to the 4:1 height and repeated vertically at locations of horizontal members every 20 feet (56.1 m) or less thereafter for scaffolds 3 feet ((0.91 m) wide or less, and every 26 feet (7.9 m) or less therafter for scaffolds greater than 3 feet (0.91m) wide.  a) 82 Main St, Camden, NY, On or about  8/24/17: The employer failed to properly tie or brace the tubular scaffold to the existing structure. The scaffold was tied to a flag pole holder by braided rope and was not substantial enough to prevent swaying of the scaffold.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F06

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(6): Scaffolds were erected, used, dismantled, altered, or moved such that they, or any conductive material handled on them, could have come closer than the minimum distances established for specific voltages as set forth in the table in subparagraph (f)(6).    a) 82 Main St, Camden, NY, 13316, On or about 8/25/17: The employer erected, and employees were accessing, a tubular fabricated scaffold that was erected within 10 feet (7 feet actual) of a 13,200 volt primary power line.   b) 82 Main St, Camden, NY, 13316, On or about 8/25/17: The employer erected, and an employee was accessing, a tubular fabricated scaffold that was erected within 3 feet (12 inches actual) of a 440 volt service entrance.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3803.00 · Current $3803.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface having an unprotected side or edge which was six or more feet (1.8m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall  arrest systems.  a) 82 Main St, Camden, NY, On or about 8/25/17: The employer failed to provide fall protection to an employee while transitioning from the tubular scaffold to the roofs edge.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems.   a) 82 Main St, Camden, NY, On or about 8/25/17: The employer failed to provide fall protection systems to an employee who was performing roofing activities on or near an unprotected edge that contained a fall o 8 feet to the platform below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342589264.