CAMDEN, NY —
OSHA Inspection: ROBERT D BAKER
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ROBERT D BAKER in 82 MAIN ST, CAMDEN, NY 13316 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342589264.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ROBERT D BAKER
- Site address
- 82 MAIN ST
- City
- CAMDEN
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 13316
- Mailing
- 11724 FLORENCE HILL RD, CAMDEN, NY 13316
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 1
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 B05 I
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2716.00 · Current $2716.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(5)(i): The end of a platform 10 feet or less in length extended over its support more than 12 inches and the platform was not designed and installed so that the cantilevered portion of the platform is able to support employees and/or materials without tipping, or has guardrails which block employee access to the cantilevered end a) 82 Main St, Camden, NY, On or about 8/25/17: The employer assembled a scaffold platform that had its cantilevered planking extended greater than 12 inches past it main support.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.451 C01 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(1)(ii): Guys, ties, and/or braces were not installed according to the scaffold manufacturer's recommendations or at the closest horizontal member to the 4:1 height and repeated vertically at locations of horizontal members every 20 feet (56.1 m) or less thereafter for scaffolds 3 feet ((0.91 m) wide or less, and every 26 feet (7.9 m) or less therafter for scaffolds greater than 3 feet (0.91m) wide. a) 82 Main St, Camden, NY, On or about 8/24/17: The employer failed to properly tie or brace the tubular scaffold to the existing structure. The scaffold was tied to a flag pole holder by braided rope and was not substantial enough to prevent swaying of the scaffold.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 F06
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(6): Scaffolds were erected, used, dismantled, altered, or moved such that they, or any conductive material handled on them, could have come closer than the minimum distances established for specific voltages as set forth in the table in subparagraph (f)(6). a) 82 Main St, Camden, NY, 13316, On or about 8/25/17: The employer erected, and employees were accessing, a tubular fabricated scaffold that was erected within 10 feet (7 feet actual) of a 13,200 volt primary power line. b) 82 Main St, Camden, NY, 13316, On or about 8/25/17: The employer erected, and an employee was accessing, a tubular fabricated scaffold that was erected within 3 feet (12 inches actual) of a 440 volt service entrance.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3803.00 · Current $3803.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface having an unprotected side or edge which was six or more feet (1.8m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. a) 82 Main St, Camden, NY, On or about 8/25/17: The employer failed to provide fall protection to an employee while transitioning from the tubular scaffold to the roofs edge.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems. a) 82 Main St, Camden, NY, On or about 8/25/17: The employer failed to provide fall protection systems to an employee who was performing roofing activities on or near an unprotected edge that contained a fall o 8 feet to the platform below.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
SIOUX FALLS, SD—2026-07-13
H & R ROOFING OF SOUTH DAKOTA, INC.
HENDERSON, NV—2026-07-13
INTEGRITY ROOFING LLC
CORTLANDT MANOR, NY—2026-07-13
LG BUILDERS INC.
CAMDEN, OH—2026-07-13
ALBERTO MORALES
BLOOMINGTON, IL—2026-07-13
UNKNOWN CONTRACTOR
More inspections in NY
POUGHKEEPSIE, NY—2026-07-13
MARCO BOARD HOUSE, INC.
CORTLANDT MANOR, NY—2026-07-13
LG BUILDERS INC.
CORTLANDT MANOR, NY—2026-07-13
RJW RENOVATIONS, LLC
HEMPSTEAD, NY—2026-07-13
NYSDOCCS NASSAU AREA OFFICE
NIAGARA FALLS, NY—2026-07-10
NTVI FEDERAL INC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342589264.