Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: E. & J. PARTS CLEANING INCORPORATED

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of E. & J. PARTS CLEANING INCORPORATED in 1669 THOMPSTON AVE DOCK LEVEL, WATERBURY, CT 06701 (NAICS 332813). OSHA activity number 342613916.

Watch E. & J. Parts Cleaning Incorporated — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for E. & J. Parts Cleaning Incorporated is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1669 THOMPSTON AVE DOCK LEVEL
City
WATERBURY
State
CT
ZIP
06701
Mailing
1669 THOMPSTON AVE P.O. BOX 4250, WATERBURY, CT 06701
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332813
Employees
14
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 D01 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4434.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 24909135

29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:  Facility:  The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazards in the workplace associated with tasks such as (but not limited to) Rust Preventive, Altrabrite, Anticorit, Metalnox, the parts cleaning process involving trichloroethylene and its ceiling levels and the particulate dust levels associated with the corn cob cleaning processes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4434

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4434.00 · Current $4434.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  Facility:  A written hazard communications program was not developed and implemented that met the criteria specified in 29 CFR1910.1200(f), (g) and (h) in that topics such as but not limited to pictograms, signal words, product identification, hazard statements, precautionary statements.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4434
  • — Z (S) $4434

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  Facility:  Each employee required to work with, around, and handle chemicals such as (but not limited to) the degreaser, were not provided with the information and training on the hazardous products  at the time of their initial assignment or whenever a new hazard was introduced.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H02 III

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(2)(iii): The employer did not provide information to the employees as to the location and availability of the written hazard communication program and safety data sheets required by 29 CFR 1910.1200:  Facility:  The employer did not provide information to each employee that utilizes hazardous chemicals in their workplace on the location and availability of the written hazard communication program and safety data sheets.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer shall assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). If such hazards are present, or likely to be present, the employer shall:  Facility:  A workplace hazard assessment was not conducted of the workplace to determine if hazards were present or likely to be present which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment (PPE).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 C02 I

Other-than-serious 5 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:  Facility:  Each employee using dust masks on a voluntary basis was not provided with the information contained within Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 L04 I

Other-than-serious 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(i): 29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(i): The powered industrial truck (PITs) operators were not trained and evaluated at least once every three years:  Facility: The powered industrial truck operators were not trained and evaluated at least once every three years.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342613916.