Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: CHANO'S ROOFING CORPORATION

Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of CHANO'S ROOFING CORPORATION in 9400 W. BELMONT AVE., FRANKLIN PARK, IL 60131 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342641297.

Watch Chano'S Roofing Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Chano'S Roofing Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
9400 W. BELMONT AVE.
City
FRANKLIN PARK
State
IL
ZIP
60131
Mailing
6337 S KEELER AVENUE, CHICAGO, IL 60629
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $12934.00 · Current $12934.00
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer safety and health program did not provide for frequent and regular inspections of job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person(s) designated by the employer:  a) On or about September 14, 2017, the employer did not ensure that it provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment by a competent person.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $12934

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $12934.00 · Current $12934.00
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe condition(s) and the regulation(s) applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazard(s) or other exposure to illness or injury:  a) On or about September 14, 2017, employees were performing roofing work and the employer did not instruct the employee's in the recognition, avoidance and control of hazards associated with the work environment.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $12934

1926.416 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $12934.00 · Current $12934.00
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): The employer permitted employees to work in such proximity to any part of an electric power circuit that the employee could contact the electric power circuit in the course of work and was not protected against electric shock by deenergizing the circuit and grounding it or by guarding it effectively by insulation or other means:  a) On September 14, 2017, employees performing masonry work were permitted to work in proximity to energized overhead primary power lines, thereby exposing employees to electric shock hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $12934

1926.502 D06 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(6)(i): Snap hooks were engaged directly to webbing, rope or wire rope when not designed for such connections:  a) On or about September 14, 2017, an employee hoisting metal gutters onto the roof wrapped a vertical lifeline around a steel pipe on the roof and engaged the snap hook back onto the vertical lifeline.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.502 D06 V

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(6)(v): Snap hooks shall not be engaged to any object which is incompatibly shaped or dimensioned in relation to the snap hook such that unintentional disengagement could occur by the connected object being able to depress the snap hook keeper and release itself:  a) On or about September 14, 2017, an employee performing roofing operations in a hoist area engaged the snap hook of one vertical lifeline to the rope grab mechanism of a separate vertical lifeline to create one extended vertical lifeline.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.502 D15

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage points used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment were not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached:  a) On or about September 14, 2017, an employee performing roofing operations in a hoist area had the personal fall arrest system secured to an abandoned pipe on the roof, the anchor point used would not support at least 5,000 pounds.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.502 D24

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(24): Personal fall arrest systems used at hoist areas were not rigged to allow movement only as far as the edge of the walking/working surface:  a) On or about September 14, 2017, an employee performing roofing operations in a hoist area had rigged his personal fall arrest system to allow movement past the edge of the walking/working surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record:  a) On or about September 14, 2017, Chano's Roofing Corporation did not prepare written certification records related to employee fall protection training.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342641297.