OSHA Inspection: ZHEN DONG JIA CONSTRUCTION

Issued

2017-12-14 00:00:00

Abate by

2017-12-22 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2716.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.403(i)(2)(i): Live parts of electric equipment operating at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by cabinets or other forms of enclosures, nor by any of the means listed in subparagraphs (A) through (D) of this paragraph.    Location:  Basement    A live electrical panel and a live outlet box lacked front covers thereby exposing employees to an electric shock hazard.

Issued

2017-12-14 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3803.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):     Jobsite:    Employees were exposed to fall hazards from unguarded floor edges, floor holes, and roof edges.

Issued

2017-12-14 00:00:00

Abate by

2018-03-30 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    Jobsite:    Employees had not received fall protection training.

Issued

2017-12-14 00:00:00

Abate by

2017-12-22 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2716.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.850(a): An engineering survey was not performed by a competent person to determine the conditions of the framing floors and walls and the possibility of unplanned collapse of any portion of the structure prior to permitting employees to start demolition operations.    Jobsite:    An engineering survey had not been done to establish that the removal of an exterior wall would not result in the unplanned collapse of the building.