Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: CARLOS PEREZ-DIAZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CARLOS PEREZ-DIAZ in 63 CENTRAL AVE., WATERBURY, CT 06702 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342708617.

Watch Carlos Perez-Diaz — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Carlos Perez-Diaz is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CARLOS PEREZ-DIAZ
Site address
63 CENTRAL AVE.
City
WATERBURY
State
CT
ZIP
06702
Mailing
195 NORTH ELM ST., WATERBURY, CT 06702
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $305.00 · Current $305.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  Location: 63 Central Avenue, Waterbury, CT 06702  a) Abatement certification and verification for Citation 01, Item 001a was not received within 10 calendar days (by December 2, 2017) following the abatement due date (November 22, 2017).  b) Abatement certification and verification for Citation 01, Item 001b was not received within 10 calendar days (by December 17, 2017) following the abatement due date (December 7, 2017).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $305

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3803.00 · Current $3803.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b).  Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were working on the residential roof at a height above 6 feet from the ground were protected from fall hazards by the use of guardrails, safety nets, personal fall arrest systems or a monitoring system.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were exposed to fall hazards while working on the roof at a height above 6 feet from the ground were trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2716.00 · Current $2716.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed.  Worksite: The side rails of the extension ladders that were used to gain access to the upper roof levels at heights up to 21 feet 10 inches above the ground did not extend at least 3 feet above the landing surfaces.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2716

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342708617.