JENSEN BEACH, FL —
OSHA Inspection: LOTUS GUNWORKS OF SOUTH FLORIDA LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of LOTUS GUNWORKS OF SOUTH FLORIDA LLC in 3558 NW FEDERAL HIGHWAY, JENSEN BEACH, FL 34957 (NAICS 451110). OSHA activity number 342732526.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LOTUS GUNWORKS OF SOUTH FLORIDA LLC
- Site address
- 3558 NW FEDERAL HIGHWAY
- City
- JENSEN BEACH
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 34957
- Mailing
- 3558 NW FEDERAL HIGHWAY, JENSEN BEACH, FL 34957
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 451110
- Employees
- 24
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1025 L01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3696.00 · Current $2218.00 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(l)(1)(i): Employee(s) working in an area where there is potential exposure to airborne lead at any level were not informed of the content of Appendices A and B of 29 CFR 1910.1025. On or about on or about October 24, 2017, at the above jobsite, the employer did not inform the employees about the hazards of lead(Pb) to which the employees are exposed. Lead (Pb)can effect the central nervous system, cause high blood pressure, joint and muscle pain, difficulties with memory or concentration, headache, abdominal pain, mood disorders, reduced sperm count and abnormal sperm, miscarriage, stillbirth or premature birth in pregnant women.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2217.6
- — Z (S) $3696
1910.134 C
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use: On or about October 24, 2017, at the above jobsite, the employer had not implemented a written respiratory program for the employees who are required to use 3M half mask respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: On or about October 24, 3017, the employer did not provide medical evaluations for the employees who are required to wear respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): On or about October 10, 2016, at the above jobsite, the employer did not provide respirator fit testing of the employers who are required to wear 3M half mask cartridge type respirators when preforming cleanup duties.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 G01 I A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): The employer shall not permit respirators with tight-fitting facepieces to be worn by employees who have: Facial hair that comes between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interferes with valve function. On about October 24th, 2017, at the above jobsite, the employer did not prohibit a tight-fitting facepiece to be worn by employees who had facial hair that comes between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 F06
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $415.00 · Current $249.00 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6): 1910.1200(f)(6): Workplace labeling. Except as provided in paragraphs (f)(7) and (f)(8) of this section, the employer shall ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace is labeled, tagged or marked On or about November 18, 2018, at the above addressed jobsite, spent casings were being stored for future shipment in the 55 gallon drum that was labeled Glycol Ether DPM Acetate.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $249
- — Z (O) $415
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use: On or about October 24, 2017, the employer did not have a safety data for lead.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 451110)
REDDING, CA—2026-07-10
REDDING SPORTS LTD
ARLINGTON, TN—2026-07-10
SILVERBACK CYCLE SERVICE, LLC
BURNSVILLE, MN—2026-07-08
111553 - ERIKS BIKE SHOP INC
SHAKOPEE, MN—2026-06-24
111462 - DAVES VALLEY SPORTS INC DBA VALLEY SPORTS
BRECKENRIDGE, CO—2026-05-15
A RACER'S EDGE
More inspections in FL
MARIANNA, FL—2026-07-13
PRIMETIME MOBILE MASONRY LLC
MELBOURNE, FL—2026-07-13
OMNIPOTENT BRANDS, LLC
QUINCY, FL—2026-07-13
WALMART
INDIAN ROCKS BEACH, FL—2026-07-10
UNKNOWN CONTRACTOR
CLEARWATER, FL—2026-07-10
ROOFTECH ROOFING & WATERPROOFING INC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342732526.