Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

CRANDALL, TX —

OSHA Inspection: CARLOS ADOLFO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

At a glance

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CARLOS ADOLFO in 1135 FM 741, CRANDALL, TX 75114 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 342803822.

Watch Carlos Adolfo — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Carlos Adolfo is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

Where did this inspection happen?

Establishment
CARLOS ADOLFO
Site address
1135 FM 741
City
CRANDALL
State
TX
ZIP
75114
Mailing
2242 WILHURT AVENUE, DALLAS, TX 75216

What kind of inspection was it?

Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B

When did the case open and close?

Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded

Establishment context

NAICS code
238170
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

Citations

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3803.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):   a) On or about November 28, 2017; where employees operated powered industrial trucks without having first completed training consisting of formal instruction, practical training, and an evaluation of the operators performance in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3803.00 · Current $1530.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):  Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer did not develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502:     a)  On or about November 28, 2017, at the multi-family residential construction site, employees were exposed to fall hazards of more than 6-feet above the ground level below while applying siding to the exterior of the building.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1530
  • — Z (S) $3803

More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)

More inspections in TX

Source

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342803822.