Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JD FABULOUS FLOORS, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of JD FABULOUS FLOORS, LLC in 657 GRAND AVENUE, NEW HAVEN, CT 06511 (NAICS 238330). OSHA activity number 342810785.

Watch JD Fabulous Floors, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for JD Fabulous Floors, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
657 GRAND AVENUE
City
NEW HAVEN
State
CT
ZIP
06511
Mailing
475 WHITNEY AVE, NEW HAVEN, CT 06511
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238330
Employees
12
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 4 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $415.00 · Current $415.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  Location: 657 Grand Avenue, New Haven, CT 06511  a) Abatement certification and verification for Citation 01, Item 001a was not received within 10 calendar days (by March 31, 2018) following the Abatement Due Date (March 21, 2018).  b) Abatement certification and verification for Citation 01, Item 001b was not received within 10 calendar days (by April 9, 2018) following the Abatement Due Date (March 30, 2018).  c) Abatement certification and verification for Citation 01, Item 001c was not received within 10 calendar days (by April 9, 2018) following the Abatement Due Date (March 30, 2018).  d) Abatement certification and verification for Citation 01, Item 002 was not received within 10 calendar days (by February 23, 2018) following the Abatement Due Date (February 13, 2018).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $415

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2217.00 · Current $500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (Construction Reference 1926.103)    Jobsite:  The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program where an employee was required to wear N-95 filtering face piece when cutting tile with power tools.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $500
  • — Z (S) $2217

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (Construction Reference 1926.103)(a)  Note:  The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.    Jobsite: The employer did not provide a medical evaluation for the employee who was required to were a N-95 filtering face piece respirator while cutting tile with a power tool.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:  (Construction Reference 1926.103)    Jobsite: The employer did not provide comprehensive and appropriate training for the employee who was required to wear N-95 filtering face piece dust mask in the care, use and hazards associated with respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.300 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2956.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.300(b)(1): Power operated tool(s), designed to accommodate guards, were not equipped with such guards when in use:    Jobsite:  The employer did not ensure that the Makita hand held right angle grinder, which was used to cut ceramic tile was equipped with an appropriate type of safety guard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $2956

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342810785.