SOUTH BARRINGTON, IL —
OSHA Inspection: JUAN DANIEL CAMACHO DBA J.D. GENERAL CONSTRUCTION INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JUAN DANIEL CAMACHO DBA J.D. GENERAL CONSTRUCTION INC. in 31 WOOD OAKS DR., SOUTH BARRINGTON, IL 60010 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 342910650.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Site address
- 31 WOOD OAKS DR.
- City
- SOUTH BARRINGTON
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60010
- Mailing
- 404 N. LIBERTY ST., ELGIN, IL 60120
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $311.00 · Current $311.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: Juan Daniel Camacho dba J.D. General Construction Inc., failed to certify to OSHA within 10 calendar days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations had been corrected: Citation Number Item Number Abatement Date 01 01 05/02/2018 01 02 05/02/2018 01 03 05/30/2018 01 04a 05/02/2018 01 04b 05/02/2018 In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF THE CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $311
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2772.00 · Current $2772.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns: a) On January 30, 2018, employees engaged in carpentry work exposed to struck-by hazards were not wearing hard hats.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2772
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3880.00 · Current $3880.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems, nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: a) On January 30, 2018, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 23 feet from the third floor deck while performing carpentry work. b) On January 30, 2018, employees were exposed to fall hazards from unguarded window openings on the second floor. c) On January 30, 2018, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 8.8 feet from a jobsite made ramp leading to a platform on the front of the home.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3880
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2772.00 · Current $2772.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a) On or about January 30, 2018, employees were exposed to fall hazards while performing carpentry work and the employer did not provide a training program to recognize fall hazards and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize those hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2772
1926.1052 C01 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2772.00 · Current $2772.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with one stair rail system along each unprotected side or edge: a) On January 30, 2018, employees were using a stairway to access the second and third floors from the first floor. The stairway that was not equipped with a stair rail system on the unprotected side.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2772
1926.1052 C12
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(12): Unprotected sides and edges of stairway landings were not provided with guardrail systems which met the criteria contained in Subpart M of 29 CFR 1926: a) On January 30, 2017, employees used the stairway to access the third floor where the landing did not have a guardrail system.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
FAIRHOPE, AL—2026-07-16
FRANCISCO ARES
WOODHAVEN, MI—2026-07-16
G.J. PERELLI CO., L.L.C.
PHILADELPHIA, PA—2026-07-16
URUS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
BERLIN, NJ—2026-07-16
URUS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
MERIDIAN, ID—2026-07-15
TRIPLE R CONSTRUCTION LLC
More inspections in IL
DEERFIELD, IL—2026-07-16
JOHN BURNS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC
BANNOCKBURN, IL—2026-07-16
BUILDER SERVICES GROUP, INC. DBA CJ INSULATION
BANNOCKBURN, IL—2026-07-16
ROOFING H.P. LLC
HIGHLAND PARK, IL—2026-07-16
UNITED PLUMBING AND DRAIN, INC.
FRANKLIN PARK, IL—2026-07-16
B & M PLASTIC INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342910650.