Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: TRACEY GEAR, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TRACEY GEAR, INC. in 740 YORK AVENUE, PAWTUCKET, RI 02861 (NAICS 333613). OSHA activity number 342913803.

Watch Tracey Gear, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Tracey Gear, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
TRACEY GEAR, INC.
Site address
740 YORK AVENUE
City
PAWTUCKET
State
RI
ZIP
02861
Mailing
740 YORK AVENUE, PAWTUCKET, RI 02861
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333613
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

14 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2217.00 · Current $1550.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, including, but not limited to Items of this section:    (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/31/2018, the employer had not developed machine specific Lockout/Tag-out procedures to control the various types of energy sources that would prevent employee exposure from an incidental start-up or movement of the machine during maintenance and repair work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1550
  • — Z (S) $2217

1910.178 L02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2956.00 · Current $2070.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace:    (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/31/2018, the employer did not ensure that forklift operators underwent the practical training and skills evaluation to complete their overall forklift training and certification process.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2070
  • — Z (S) $2956

1910.178 L04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:   (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/31/2018, the employer did not ensure that a forklift operator underwent a skills performance evaluation ever three years.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l):   (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/31/2018, the employer did not ensure that forklift operators held a current certification to show that they successfully completed the instructional and practical training, as well as the skills evaluation in the overall forklift training process.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 M05 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(m)(5)(ii): A powered industrial truck was left unattended when the operator was 25 ft. or more away from the vehicle which remained in view, or whenever the operator left the vehicle and it was not in view:  (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/31/2018, the employer did not ensure that whenever forklift operators leave a powered industrial truck unattended, the forklift blades are lowered to the floor level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5174.00 · Current $3620.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Points of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employees from having any part of their body in the danger zones during operating cycles:    (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/31/2018, the employer did not ensure that the point-of-operation on the Barber Colman Hubbing Machine was guarded to protect employees from contact with moving parts, as well as any discharged metal chips or metal working fluids.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3620
  • — Z (S) $5174

1910.212 B

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.212(b): Machines designed for fixed locations were not securely anchored to prevent walking or moving:     (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/31/2018, the employer did not ensure that pedestal grinder/buffing/wire wheel machines were secured from walking or movement during operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.215 A02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(2): Abrasive wheel used on grinding machinery were not provided with a safety guard which covered the spindle end, nut, flange projections:   (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/31/2018, the employer did not ensure that the large pedestal grinding wheel near the shipping/receiving area had its spindle end guard in place.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rests on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one-eighth inch:  (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/31/2018, the employer did not ensure that bench and pedestal grinder work rests were adjusted to a maximum opening of one-eighth inch to the wheel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one-fourth inch:     (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/31/2018, the employer did not ensure that bench and pedestal grinders had their tongue guards in place and adjusted to a maximum opening of one-fourth inch from the abrasive wheel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.219 C02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(2)(i): All exposed parts of horizontal shafting seven (7) feet or less from floor or working platform were not protected by stationary casing enclosing shafting completely or by trough enclosing sides and top or sides and bottom of shafting:   (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/31/2018, the employer did not ensure that the drive shafts turning the Barber Colman Hubbing Machine were guarded from the top to prevent employees from coming in contact with these moving parts, and to prevent tools and other items from falling into this area of the machine during operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.219 E03 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(3)(i): Vertical or inclined belts were not enclosed by guards conforming to the requirements specified at 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):   (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/31/2018, the employer did not ensure that the small Hubbing Machine and the ID Grinding Machine drive belts were fully guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):   (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/31/2018, the employer had not performed a hazard assessment for the use of personal protective equipment, such as the need to wear protective gloves when working with or near metal chips/strands when cleaning machines.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $415.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:     (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/31/2018, the employer had not developed a hazard communication program that described the criteria for chemical warnings, labeling, Safety Data Sheets and employee training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $415

View TRACEY GEAR, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342913803.