NEW MILFORD, CT —
OSHA Inspection: CHEMICAL MARKETING CONCEPTS, LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CHEMICAL MARKETING CONCEPTS, LLC in 200 PICKETT DISTRICT ROAD, NEW MILFORD, CT 06776 (NAICS 424690). OSHA activity number 342941770.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CHEMICAL MARKETING CONCEPTS, LLC
- Site address
- 200 PICKETT DISTRICT ROAD
- City
- NEW MILFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06776
- Mailing
- 200 PICKETT DISTRICT ROAD, NEW MILFORD, CT 06776
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 424690
- Employees
- 66
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4398.00 · Current $2199.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: Packaging area; On or about 2/12/18, the employer did not have a written respiratory protection program that included the requirements of the program and workplace procedures for complying with the program. Employees are required to wear half or full face respirators when dispensing chemicals in the packaging area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2199
- — Z (S) $4398
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:(a) Packaging area; On or about 2/12/18, temporary workers that were provided respirators for use during packaging operations , were not provided medical evaluations prior to use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4398.00 · Current $2199.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years: Receiving area; On or about 2/12/18, employees who operate a forklift were not evaluated for operating performance at least every three years.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2199
- — Z (S) $4398
1910.1048 D01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5497.00 · Current $2749.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(d)(1)(i): Employees of a workplace covered by this standard were not monitored to determine their exposure to formaldehyde:(a) Packaging area; On or about 2/12/18, employees packaging materials that contain formaldehyde were not monitored to determine their exposure. The company repackages several materials containing up to 5% formaldehyde.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2748.5
- — Z (S) $5497
1910.1048 M01 III
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1048(m)(1)(iii): The employer did not include Formaldehyde in the hazard communication program to comply with the HCS (� 1910.1200). The employer did not ensure that each employee had access to labels on containers of Formaldehyde and to safety data sheets, and is trained in accordance with the requirements of HCS and paragraph (n) of this section. Production, repackaging area; On or about 2/12/18, the employer did not include training on formaldehyde in their Hazard Communication training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4712.00 · Current $2356.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s) Production, repackaging area; On or about 2/12/18, the employer did not make safety data sheets readily available to employees working with chemicals in the production area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2356
- — Z (S) $4712
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 424690)
DEERFIELD BEACH, FL—2026-07-10
OXYGEN DEVELOPMENT
PAWTUCKET, RI—2026-07-08
SOLVENT DIRECT
HONOLULU, HI—2026-06-19
AIRGAS USA, LLC
BAYTOWN, TX—2026-06-16
SYNTHETIC OILS & LUBRICANTS OF TEXAS, INC.
INDIANAPOLIS, IN—2026-06-08
MINTEK RESOURCES / OMNI MATERIALS
More inspections in CT
BRIDGEPORT, CT—2026-07-10
WRR, INC.
BERLIN, CT—2026-07-10
MMF CONSTRUCTION LLC
NAUGATUCK, CT—2026-07-08
WHITING-TURNER LCT2 JOINT VENTURE
SOMERS, CT—2026-07-08
F&G RECYCLING LLC
STAMFORD, CT—2026-07-07
FAIRFIELD AVENUE MAINTENANCE COMPANY, INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342941770.