Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: THE ZWELLING COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of THE ZWELLING COMPANY in 22 SOUTH BROADWAY ST., LEBANON, OH 45036 (NAICS 722110). OSHA activity number 342951589.

Watch THE Zwelling Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for THE Zwelling Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
22 SOUTH BROADWAY ST.
City
LEBANON
State
OH
ZIP
45036
Mailing
22 SOUTH BROADWAY ST., LEBANON, OH 45036
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
722110
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2513.00 · Current $500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1)(i): The employer did not select and have each affected employee use, the types of personal protective equipment that would protect the affected employee(s) from the hazards identified in the hazard assessment:    The employer did not enforce the use of heat resistant gloves for employees who wipe the grill top (thermal burns) with a towel after cleaning.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $500
  • — Z (S) $2513

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes.    The employer did not require the use of hand protection for employees who work in the kitchen while performing tasks such as wiping off a 300-350°F grill with a towel after cleaning (thermal burns).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2513.00 · Current $500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):     The employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program for employees exposed to chemicals such as, but not limited to, Scotch Brite Quick Clean Griddle Liquid (thermal burns).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $500
  • — Z (S) $2513

1910.1200 E01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The written hazard communication program did not include a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present, using an identity that was referenced on the appropriate material safety data sheet:    The employer's hazard communication program did not include a chemical inventory list.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    The employer did not train employees on the hazards of the chemicals such as Scotch Brite Quick Clean griddle liquid (thermal burns).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:    A written certification of a hazard assessment had not been completed by employer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342951589.