Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: PHILS CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PHILS CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 8253 WATERS DRIVE, MACEDONIA, OH 44056 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342975786.

Watch Phils Construction, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Phils Construction, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
8253 WATERS DRIVE
City
MACEDONIA
State
OH
ZIP
44056
Mailing
10258 PAGE ROAD, STREETSBORO, OH 44241
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.100(a): At this job site, employees exposed to possible head injury from falling or flying objects or from impact with hand tools, equipment and building materials during construction operations were not wearing hard hats.   On or about February 26, 2018, the employer failed to ensure employees who were working at a residential roofing job site were wearing protective head gear (hard hats).  Employee were exposed to hazards such as but not limited to flying nails from electric nail guns, flying pieces and debris from removing and replacing the roof, part of its foundation and gutter work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.102 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  On or about February 26, 2018, the employer failed to ensure employees who were working at a residential roofing job site were wearing protective safety eye wear.  Employee were exposed to hazards such as but not limited to flying nails from electric nail guns, flying pieces and debris from removing and replacing the roof, part of its foundation and gutter work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3880.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):     On or about February 26, 2018, the employer failed to ensure that employees who were working on a residential rooftop (approximate height at the access point via a portable ladder was 10.6 feet) were protected from a fall from height hazard.  Employees were not wearing a personal fall protection harness nor were any other fall protection measures in place to protect employees from a fall.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3880.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs necessary to ensure compliance with the Occupational Safety and Health Standards:            On or about February 26, 2018, the employer failed to develop safety and health programs and perform site inspections to ensure employees were not exposed to potentially hazardous conditions, such as but not limited to fall from height hazards, eye and head injuries.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3880.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    On or about February 26, 2018, the employer failed to ensure that a portable ladder that was used to access the lower portion of a residential roof was extended at least three feet past the access point of the roof.  The ladder was actually observed flush with the roof access point.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3880

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342975786.