Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: DICK BAKER ROOFING, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DICK BAKER ROOFING, INC. in 9401 BAYTREE DRIVE, POWELL, OH 43065 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342979028.

Watch Dick Baker Roofing, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Dick Baker Roofing, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
9401 BAYTREE DRIVE
City
POWELL
State
OH
ZIP
43065
Mailing
4730 KENNY ROAD, COLUMBUS, OH 43220
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2772.00 · Current $2772.00
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.    a. On or before February 27, 2018, the employer failed to initiate and maintain safety and health programs such as, but not limited to fall protection, thereby exposing employees to 20-foot fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2772
  • — Z (S) $2772

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2772.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.    a. On or before February 27, 2018, where an employee was working on the roof of a house, the employee was not protected from falls, thereby being exposed to a 20 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2772

1926.503 C03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2772.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(c)(3): Inadequacies in an affected employee's knowledge or use of fall protection systems or equipment indicate that the employee has not retained the requisite understanding or skill.  Note: The following appendices to subpart M of this part serve as non-mandatory guidelines to assist employers in complying with the appropriate requirements of subpart M of this part.  [59 FR 40738, Aug. 9, 1994; 60 FR 5131, Jan. 26, 1995]    a. On or before February 27, 2018, where an employee was conducting roofing work, the employee did not understand the fall protection requirements, thereby being exposed to a 20-foot fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2772

View DICK BAKER ROOFING, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342979028.