JESUP, GA —
OSHA Inspection: WAYNE SHEET METAL AND FABRICATION, LLC.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of WAYNE SHEET METAL AND FABRICATION, LLC. in 1060 WEST PINE STREET, JESUP, GA 31546 (NAICS 332322). OSHA activity number 343211470.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- WAYNE SHEET METAL AND FABRICATION, LLC.
- Site address
- 1060 WEST PINE STREET
- City
- JESUP
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 31546
- Mailing
- 1060 WEST PINE STREET, JESUP, GA 31546
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332322
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 A04
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2217.00 · Current $1756.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications and additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial truck were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval: a) At the site, in the shop, on or about and at times prior to June 7, 2018, the employer did not remove from service a forklift that was modified with a trailer hitch that was attached to the left fork used by employees to move materials around the facility, exposing employees to the struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1755.5
- — Z (S) $2217
1910.178 L01 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2772.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck: a) At the facility, in the shop, on or about and at times prior to June 7, 2018, the employer did not ensure employees were effectively trained and certified to operate the company's "Nissan" forklift, exposing employees to struck-by and crushing hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2772
1910.253 B04 III
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2772.00 · Current $1756.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(iii): Oxygen cylinders in storage were not separated from fuel-gas cylinders or combustible materials (especially oil or grease), a minimum distance of 20 feet: At the facility, in the shop, on June 7, 2018, the employer did not ensure cylinders of acetylene and oxygen were stored at a distance of 20-feet or greater from each other, exposing employees to fire and explosion hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1755.5
- — Z (S) $2772
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2772.00 · Current $1756.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): a) At the facility, in the shop, on or about and at times prior to June 7, 2018, the employer did not develop a written hazard communication program for employees who worked with oxygen and acetylene while performing various welding and cutting activities, exposing employees to fire and explosion hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1755.5
- — Z (S) $2772
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a) At the facility, in the shop, on or about and at times prior to June 7, 2018, the employer did not provide training for employees how used acetylene and oxygen who performing various welding and cutting tasks during their work, exposing employees to explosion and fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.37 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit": a) At the facility, in the shop, the employer did not ensure a door used by employees for access and egress from the shop was marked by a sign reading "Exit."
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) At the facility, in the shop, the employer did not provide for medical evaluations for employees who were required to wear 3M, half-face respirators while performing various tasks such as, but not limited to, spray painting and welding.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: a) At the facility, in the shop, on or about and at times prior to June 7, 2018, the employer did not ensure employees who were required to use 3M, half-face respirators were fit tested.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 H02 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve: a) At the facility, in the shop, on or about and at times prior to June 7, 2018, the employer did not ensure the employees who were required to use 3M, half-face, respirators properly stored the respirators after use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 K
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary: a) At the facility, in the shop, on or about and at times prior to June 7, 2018, the employer did not ensure that employees who were required to wear 3M respirators were effectively training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332322)
PERTH AMBOY, NJ—2026-07-16
ENGLERT INC.
BRIDGEPORT, WV—2026-07-14
MID ATLANTIC METALWORKS INC.
KISSIMMEE, FL—2026-07-14
JELD-WEN
CASTLE ROCK, CO—2026-07-10
MASTER MAGNETICS, INC.
PITTSBURG, KS—2026-07-09
PROGRESSIVE PRODUCTS INC
More inspections in GA
GREENSBORO, GA—2026-07-16
PURE BEAUTY FARMS, INC.
FOREST PARK, GA—2026-07-16
POLYNT COMPOSITES USA INC.
AUGUSTA, GA—2026-07-16
GF CASTING SOLUTIONS AUGUSTA, LLC
CHAMBLEE, GA—2026-07-16
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
DECATUR, GA—2026-07-15
PALLETS ACQUISITION LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343211470.