Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JUAN MIGUEL BERNABE

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JUAN MIGUEL BERNABE in 13103 HIMBAUGH AVE, OMAHA, NE 68154 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343253670.

Watch Juan Miguel Bernabe — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Juan Miguel Bernabe is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JUAN MIGUEL BERNABE
Site address
13103 HIMBAUGH AVE
City
OMAHA
State
NE
ZIP
68154
Mailing
6715 S. 32ND ST., OMAHA, NE 68107
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2217.00 · Current $2217.00
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(2): Eye and face protective equipment being used did not used meet the requirements specified in Z 87.1-1968.                                                                                                             The employer is failing to protect employees from struck-by hazards associated with using pneumatic nail guns without wearing approved eye protection.  The most recent occurrence of this was observed on June 26th, 2018 at an existing residential home located at 13103 Himebaugh Ave, Omaha, NE where the employer has employees using pneumatic nail guns to secure the shingles they were installing on the roof without wearing any ANSI approved eye protection.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $2217
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $2217

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3880.00 · Current $3880.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.                                                                                                            The employer is failing to protect employees from fall hazards associated with performing residential construction activity while exposed to falls 6 feet or greater.  The most recent occurrence of this was observed on June 26th, 2018 at an existing residential home located at 13103 Himebaugh Ave, Omaha, NE where the employer has a crew of 4 employees installing roof shingles exposed to fall hazards while they were working off the roof of the home without any form of conventional fall protection.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $3880
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2772.00 · Current $2772.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):  The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:   The employer is failing to train employees on the hazards associated with performing residential construction activity while exposed to falls 6 feet or greater.  The most recent occurrence of this was observed on June 26th, 2018 at an existing residential home located at 13103 Himebaugh Ave, Omaha, NE where the employer has a crew of 4 inadequately trained employees installing roof shingles exposed to fall hazards while they were working off the roof of the home without any form of conventional fall protection.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $2772
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $2772

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3880.00 · Current $3880.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):  Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladders length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder(s) was/were not secured at its top to a rigid support, and/or a grasping device, such as a grabrail, was not provided to assist the employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder:  The employer is failing to protect employees from the hazards associated with using an extension ladder as means of access and egress from the roof of an existing residential home in residential construction activities.  The most recent occurrence of this was observed on June 26th, 2018 at an existing residential home located at 13103 Himebaugh Ave, Omaha, NE where the employer has a crew of 4 employees using an aluminum extension ladder as means of access and egress to the roof of the home without extending the ladder a minimum of 3 feet.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $3880
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.1060 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2772.00 · Current $2772.00
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each employee has been trained by a competent person in the following areas, as applicable:     The employer is failing to train employees on the hazards associated with using an extension ladder as means of access and egress from the roof of an existing residential home in residential construction activities.  The most recent occurrence of this was observed on June 26th, 2018 at an existing residential home located at 13103 Himebaugh Ave, Omaha, NE where the employer has a crew of 4 inadequately trained employees using an aluminum extension ladder as means of access and egress to the roof of the home without extending the ladder a minimum of 3 feet.
Recent events (3)
  • — A (S) $2772
  • — I (S) $1500
  • — Z (S) $2772

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343253670.