WILTON, CT —
OSHA Inspection: WILTON HOSPITAL FOR ANIMALS, P.C.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of WILTON HOSPITAL FOR ANIMALS, P.C. in 215 DANBURY ROAD, WILTON, CT 06897 (NAICS 541940). OSHA activity number 343263950.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- WILTON HOSPITAL FOR ANIMALS, P.C.
- Site address
- 215 DANBURY ROAD
- City
- WILTON
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06897
- Mailing
- 215 DANBURY ROAD, WILTON, CT 06897
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 541940
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.37 A03
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2772.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed: Second Office: The exit door was blocked with a digital photo scope.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2772
1910.37 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit": Establishment: Several doorways in the facility were not mark with signs reading "Exit".
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.37 B05
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(5): Each doorway or passage along an exit access that could be mistaken for an exit was not marked "Not an Exit" or similar designation, or be identified by a sign indicating its actual use (e.g. closet): Establishment: Several doorways in the facility were not marked "Not an Exit" where the doorways were leading to a locked fence area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2217.00 · Current $1100.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered: Establishment: The employees manually transporting "old and used" sharps were not wearing appropriate type of personal protective equipment PPE).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1100
- — Z (S) $2217
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). Establishment: The employer did not perform Workplace Hazard Assessment to determine necessary and appropriate types of personal protective equipment (PPE) for the employees manually transporting "old and used" sharps.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 541940)
PASADENA, CA—2026-06-23
BANFIELD PET HOSPITAL
LAS VEGAS, NV—2026-06-23
ANIMAL KINDNESS VETERINARY HOSPITAL
SAINT JOSEPH, KY—2026-06-22
69240 - CAREVET TMS LLC
LEXINGTON, VA—2026-06-10
BLUE RIDGE ANIMAL CLINIC, P.C.
PORTLAND, OR—2026-06-08
317744080 - BRIDGETOWN VETERINARY EMERGENCY & REFERRAL
More inspections in CT
ENFIELD, CT—2026-07-16
MOMS ENFIELD
DAYVILLE, CT—2026-07-16
HARBOR FREIGHT
NEW BRITAIN, CT—2026-07-14
JANANII, LLC
NEWINGTON, CT—2026-07-14
TRUSS MANUFACTURING INC
NORTH BRANFORD, CT—2026-07-14
NYK STATEWIDE MOLINA CONSTRUCTION LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343263950.