Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: EAGLE INDUSTRIES OF OHIO INC.

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related health inspection of EAGLE INDUSTRIES OF OHIO INC. in 3025 URWILER AVE, CINCINNATI, OH 45211 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343283495.

Watch Eagle Industries OF Ohio INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Eagle Industries OF Ohio INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3025 URWILER AVE
City
CINCINNATI
State
OH
ZIP
45211
Mailing
275 COMMERCIAL DRIVE, FAIRFIELD, OH 45014
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
28
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.1101 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $6467.00 · Current $3200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(e)(1): All Class I, II and III asbestos work shall be conducted within regulated areas. All other operations covered by this standard shall be conducted within a regulated area where airborne concentrations of asbestos exceed, or there is a reasonable possibility they may exceed a PEL. Regulated areas shall comply with the requirements of paragraphs (2), (3),(4) and (5) of this section.     The controlling employer did not ensure that Class II work was conducted within a regulated area in that on June 14, 2018, subcontractors employees removed asbestos-containing shingles and threw the shingles to the ground. Bulk sample results revealed that the shingles contained 10.38% chrysotile asbestos and the mastic contained 14.25% chrysotile asbestos.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3200
  • — Z (S) $6467

1926.1101 K07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(7)(i): Warning signs that demarcate the regulated area shall be provided and displayed at each location where a regulated area is required to be established by paragraph (e) of this section. Signs shall be posted at such a distance from such a location that an employee may read the signs and take necessary protective steps before entering the area marked by the signs.   The controlling employer did not ensure that warning signs were provided and displayed at a location where a regulated area was required in that on June 14, 2018, subcontractors removed asbestos containing shingles and no warning signs were provided or displayed. Bulk sample results revealed that the shingles contained 10.38% chrysotile asbestos and the mastic contained 14.25% chrysotile asbestos.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 F01 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $6467.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(f)(1)(i): Each employer who has a workplace or work operation where exposure monitoring is required under this section shall perform monitoring to determine accurately the airborne concentrations of asbestos to which employees may be exposed.    The controlling employer did not ensure air monitoring was performed when Class II work was conducted to determine airborne concentrations in that on June 14, 2018, subcontractor employees removed asbestos-containing shingles from a residential roof. Bulk sampling results revealed the roof tile contained 10.38% chrysotile asbestos and the mastic contained 14.25% chrysotile asbestos.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $6467

1926.1101 F02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $6467.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(f)(2)(i): Each employer who has a workplace or work operation covered by this standard shall ensure that a "competent person" conducts an exposure assessment immediately before or at the initiation of the operation to ascertain expected exposures during that operation or workplace. The assessment must be completed in time to comply with requirements which are triggered by exposure data or the lack of a "negative exposure assessment," and to provide information necessary to assure that all control systems planned are appropriate for that operation and will work properly.    The controlling employer did not ensure that a competent person conducted an exposure assessment in that on June 14, 2018 subcontractor employees removed asbestos-containing roof tiles and threw the shingles off the roof from heights greater than 23 feet. Bulk sampling results of the roof shingles revealed that the tile contained 10.38% chrysotile asbestos and the mastic contained 14.25% chrysotile asbestos.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $6467

1926.1101 G07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $6467.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(7)(i): All Class II work shall be supervised by a competent person as defined in paragraph (b) of this section.     The controlling employer did not ensure that all Class II work was supervised by a competent person, exposing its own employees and subcontractor employees in that on June 14, 2018 subcontractor employees removed and threw asbestos-containing shingles from a residential roof to the ground. Bulk samples results revealed that the roof shingles contained 10.388% chrysotile asbestos and the mastic contained 14.25% chrysotile asbestos.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $6467

1926.1101 K03 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $6467.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(3)(i): Before work in areas containing ACM and PACM is begun; employers shall identify the presence, location, and quantity of ACM, and/or PACM therein pursuant to paragraph (k)(1) of this section.    The controlling employer did not identify the presence, location and quantity of ACM, and/or PACM before roofing work began in that on June 14, 2018, subcontractor employees removed asbestos-containing shingles and the controlling employer informed the subcontractor that the roofing tiles contained good asbestos. Bulk samples revealed that the roofing tiles contained 10.38% chrysotile asbestos and the mastic contained 14.25% chrysotile asbestos.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $6467

1926.1101 G08 II A

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $6467.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(8)(ii)(A): Roofing material shall be removed in an intact state to the extent feasible.  The Controlling Employer did not ensure that asbestos-containing shingles were removed in an intact state in that on June 14, 2018, subcontractor employees were using hammers and shovels to break up shingles for removal. Bulk samples revealed the shingles contained 10.38% chrysotile asbestos and the mastic 14.25% chrysotile asbestos.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $6467

1926.1101 G08 II B

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(8)(ii)(B): Wet methods shall be used to remove roofing materials that are not intact, or that will be rendered not intact during removal, unless such wet methods are not feasible or will create safety hazards.  The controlling employer did not ensure that wet methods were used to remove asbestos-containing shingles in that on June 14, 2018, subcontractor employees removed asbestos containing shingles with hammers and shovels while throwing the shingles off the roof at heights greater than 23 feet. Bulk sampling results revealed the roofing tile contained 10.38% chrysotile asbestos and the mastic contained 14.25% chrysotile asbestos.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 G08 II E

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(8)(ii)(E): Asbestos-containing material that has been removed from a roof shall not be dropped or thrown to the ground. Unless the material is carried or passed to the ground by hand, it shall be lowered to the ground via covered, dust-tight chute, crane or hoist:  The controlling employer did not ensure that asbestos-containing shingles were not dropped or thrown to the ground in that on June 14, 2018, subcontractor employees were removing asbestos-containing shingles and throwing shingles off the roof at heights greater than 23 feet to the ground below. Bulk sample results revealed the shingles contained 10.38% chrysotile asbestos and the mastic contained 14.25% chrysotile asbestos.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 G08 II F

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(8)(ii)(F): Upon being lowered, unwrapped material shall be transferred to a closed receptacle in such manner so as to preclude the dispersion of dust.  The controlling employer did not ensure that unwrapped asbestos-containing shingles were lowered and transferred to a closed receptacle in that on June 14, 2018, subcontractor employees broke up roof shingles and threw shingles off the roof at heights greater than 23 feet. Bulk samples revealed that the shingles contained 10.38% chrysotile asbestos and the mastic contained 14.25% chrysotile asbestos..
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 K09 IV A

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6467.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(9)(iv)(A): For work with asbestos containing roofing materials, flooring materials, siding materials, ceiling tiles, or transite panels, training shall include at a minimum all the elements included in paragraph (k)(9)(viii) of this section and in addition, the specific work practices and engineering controls set forth in paragraph (g) of this section which specifically relate to that category. Such course shall include "hands-on" training and shall take at least 8 hours.   The controlling employer did not ensure that employees were trained on the elements of this paragraph in that on June 14, 2018, subcontractor employees removed asbestos containing roofing tiles and the and the employees had not been trained.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $6467

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343283495.