Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: CGP INC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CGP INC in 1001 ARMSTRONG BLVD SUITE C, KISSIMMEE, FL 34741 (NAICS 337110). OSHA activity number 343286845.

Watch CGP INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for CGP INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CGP INC
Site address
1001 ARMSTRONG BLVD SUITE C
City
KISSIMMEE
State
FL
ZIP
34741
Mailing
1001 ARMSTRONG BLVD SUITE C, KISSIMMEE, FL 34741
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
337110
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2217.00 · Current $2217.00
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in that, employees were exposed to the hazard of being struck by fragments of Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) plastic pipe in the event the pipe ruptured:  a) In the fabrication/production area, PVC plastic piping was used in exposed above ground areas to transport compressed air. This violation was observed on or about July 11, 2018.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2217

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1663.00 · Current $1663.00
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a) Employee was required to wear a filtering facepiece respirator without the employer having a written respiratory protection program. This violation was observed on or about July 11, 2018.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1663

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a) Employee was required to wear a filtering facepiece respirator without having a medical evaluation performed. This violation was observed on or about July 11, 2018.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  a) Employee was required to wear a filtering facepiece respirator without having a fit test performed. This violation was observed on or about July 11, 2018.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 A05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(5): The powered industrial truck was equipped with front-end attachments other than factory installed attachments, however the employer did not request that the truck be marked to identify the attachments and show the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with load laterally centered:  a) In the warehouse/fabrication area, the employer did not ensure that all nameplates and markings identified front-end attachments other than factory installed attachments with the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation. This violation was discovered on or about July 11, 2018.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 A06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6): The employer did not ensure that all nameplates or markings were maintained in a legible condition  a) In the warehouse/fabrication area, the employer did not ensure that all nameplates and markings were maintained in a legible condition. This violation was discovered on or about July 11, 2018.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a) The employer did not provide a written hazard communication program for employees exposed to silica dust. This violation was observed on or about July 11, 2018.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use  a) The employer did not have safety data sheets for each of the granites that they fabricate. This violation was observed on or about July 11, 2018.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343286845.