Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: CARCAMO ROOFING LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CARCAMO ROOFING LLC in 9600 E. KENT PLACE, AURORA, CO 80014 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343343232.

Watch Carcamo Roofing LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Carcamo Roofing LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CARCAMO ROOFING LLC
Site address
9600 E. KENT PLACE
City
AURORA
State
CO
ZIP
80014
Mailing
13101 E.13TH PL., #4, AURORA, CO 80011
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3326.00 · Current $2000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:    a) On or about July 24, 2018 and at times prior, an employee was exposed to overhead hazards from roofing materials being thrown from the roof to the ground. The employee was not wearing a protective helmet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $3326

1926.451 B01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3880.00 · Current $2000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1)(i): Each platform unit (e.g., scaffold plank, fabricated plank, fabricated deck, or fabricated platform) was not installed so that the space between adjacent units and the space between the platform and the uprights were no more than 1 inch (2.5 cm) wide, except where the employer can demonstrate that a wider space is necessary:      (a)  On or about July 24, 2018, four employees were exposed to fall hazards approximately up to 32 feet while riding on a pallet on the fork of a powered industrial truck to access a roof of a 3-story residential unit. The employees used the pallet on the fork as a scaffold platform and had gaps in the platform greater than 1 inch.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:   (a)  On or about July 24, 2018, four employees were exposed to fall hazards approximately up to 32 feet while riding on a pallet on the fork of a powered industrial truck to access a roof of a 3-story residential unit. The employees were not protected with a fall protection system while riding on the pallet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 C02 V

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(v): Fork-lifts were used to support scaffold platforms while the entire platform was not attached to the fork and the fork-lift was moved horizontally while the platform was occupied:  a) On or about July 24, 2018 and at times prior, four employees were exposed to fall hazards approximately up to 32 feet while accessing the roof of a 3-story residential unit. The employer did not ensure the platform was secured on the forklift and not moved horizontally.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3880.00 · Current $2000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):    a) On or about July 24, 2018 and at times prior, four employees were exposed to fall hazards of 16 to 32 feet while working on the roof of 2 to 3-story residential units. The employees were not protected by a fall protection system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2772.00 · Current $2000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    a) On or about July 24, 2018 and at times prior, six employees were exposed to fall hazards of 16 feet while using an extension ladder to access the roof of a 2-story residential unit. The side rail of the ladder was not extended at least 3 feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2772

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343343232.